M BMW is more reliable than your Honda
#21
Registered User
I owned a 2013 bmw 335i m sport for three years, other than....run flat had a buble after 5000 miles, rev hang all the time: probably due to car wanting an automatic rather than a manual, cutting out into limp home mode several times for no reason, fix was to pull over and restart...it was problem free.....mushy 3 setting suspension was garbage, bouncy suspension, cheap interior parts, nav was fair.
new 2016 m3, no issues of any type, even the tech is better, sure voice activation misunderstands me sometimes but it's solid so far after 8 months or hard use....this is the bmw i wanted.
neither car left me stranded, i paid 0 for maintenance other than tires, and the m car is head over heels better...
new 2016 m3, no issues of any type, even the tech is better, sure voice activation misunderstands me sometimes but it's solid so far after 8 months or hard use....this is the bmw i wanted.
neither car left me stranded, i paid 0 for maintenance other than tires, and the m car is head over heels better...
#23
Hard to take this JD Power "study" seriously when nearly one in four complaints are sourced to infotainment systems. From the JD Power press release:
Bluetooth pairing? Seems like a stretch to give a vehicle poor reliability marks just because you have trouble pairing your iPhone with it...
Bluetooth pairing? Seems like a stretch to give a vehicle poor reliability marks just because you have trouble pairing your iPhone with it...
#24
One of the reasons I sold my Wrx was the Bluetooth in it sucked. People could barely hear me.
#25
Having a phone pair correctly with a car is not asking much...
#26
They weren't Honda's, but ever since 1978 my now 80 year-old father has owned Japanese cars, always purchased new: a 280Z, 280ZX, Turbocharged RX-7, SC-400, and finally a G35. Last year he wanted to replace the G35, and I talked him into looking at a BMW 235i. Well, the salesman talked him down(!) to a 228i, and my father bought the car. Absolutely loves it! I did caution him that I suspected the maintenance would be very expensive on the car (I met a BMW dealership service manager once who told me that he always has people bringing in cars which they obviously cannot afford to keep, giving him sob stories and trying to get him to lower their repair bills). My father's attitude is that he'll keep the car until the end of the warranty and then trade it in.
#27
They weren't Honda's, but ever since 1978 my now 80 year-old father has owned Japanese cars, always purchased new: a 280Z, 280ZX, Turbocharged RX-7, SC-400, and finally a G35. Last year he wanted to replace the G35, and I talked him into looking at a BMW 235i. Well, the salesman talked him down(!) to a 228i, and my father bought the car. Absolutely loves it! I did caution him that I suspected the maintenance would be very expensive on the car (I met a BMW dealership service manager once who told me that he always has people bringing in cars which they obviously cannot afford to keep, giving him sob stories and trying to get him to lower their repair bills). My father's attitude is that he'll keep the car until the end of the warranty and then trade it in.
My second one was a 06 with it bored and stroked, engine build was done by a very reputable company and ran fine, but I had to replace the motor TWICE before this build even happened. Both times was due to scoring of the piston rings, common issue/tsb with the coupes..
I heard those new 2 series are a hoot to drive, the rear end of the cars haven't fully grown on me yet though - I've finally just started to appreciate the rear of the 135i (lol). BMW's styling for me is a hit and miss. To this day, my neighbor's i8 still looks way too much like Shamu.
#28
(Disclosure: I'm a software engineer doing embedded work with a specialty in networking. I have firsthand experience debugging devices running three different BT stacks - native android (multiple versions), one we developed in-house, and a third party offering.)
It's a little more complicated than you might think. Sure, nominally, Bluetooth works. And works pretty well. But it's not dead reliable, and IMO, it never will be. Each BT stack comes with its own set of idiosyncracies and issues (and defects). Then you have different versions of the Bluetooth specification, with some commands and/or procedures deprecated, while new ones are also added. When you consider the thousands of different BT devices out there and all the different versions of BT stack software running on them, it shouldn't come as a surprise that problems crop up from time to time. It's not practical (or possible?) for a device manufacturer to test all possible device and software combinations for every possible use case. Some people at the fringes are going to run into issues from time to time.
On the other hand... if there was a reference BT implementation that everyone could pick up, and everyone ran the exact same version of it... now we're talking!
/soapbox
It's a little more complicated than you might think. Sure, nominally, Bluetooth works. And works pretty well. But it's not dead reliable, and IMO, it never will be. Each BT stack comes with its own set of idiosyncracies and issues (and defects). Then you have different versions of the Bluetooth specification, with some commands and/or procedures deprecated, while new ones are also added. When you consider the thousands of different BT devices out there and all the different versions of BT stack software running on them, it shouldn't come as a surprise that problems crop up from time to time. It's not practical (or possible?) for a device manufacturer to test all possible device and software combinations for every possible use case. Some people at the fringes are going to run into issues from time to time.
On the other hand... if there was a reference BT implementation that everyone could pick up, and everyone ran the exact same version of it... now we're talking!
/soapbox
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Saki GT
Car and Bike Talk
28
11-01-2015 01:44 PM
Ben22
Car and Bike Talk
38
05-12-2014 11:06 AM