S2000 Brakes and Suspension Discussions about S2000 brake and suspension systems.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Sake Bomb

Öhlins DFV Recommended Pre-load vs Ride height - Helpful Chart Inside!

Old 03-10-2017, 10:46 PM
  #31  

 
ckowalc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 129
Received 33 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

So I was looking at this a little bit more and Sakebomb's chart says every 3mm of preload added raises ride height ~1.77mm (~0.07 in). This seems to be preload multiplied by motion ratio or 3 * 0.578 = 1.73mm. However, wouldn't it be preload divided by motion ratio or 3 / 0.578 = 5.19mm?

Isn't adding 3mm of preload just like adding 3mm of shock length? Doesn't the change get "magnified" by the length of the control arm?

Maybe I'm having a brain fart?
Old 03-11-2017, 04:13 AM
  #32  

 
bgoetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,730
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Are you saying 3mm length change (+or-)=~5mm height? I am just asking because I am trying to figure where mine need to be to get the right height
Old 03-13-2017, 02:41 PM
  #33  

 
ckowalc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 129
Received 33 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Yes, what I'm saying is if you increase preload by 3mm -OR- increase damper length by 3mm, you will increase ride height ~5mm. That is not what Sakebomb's chart is saying but I've thought about it over the weekend and still come to the same conclusion.
Old 03-13-2017, 03:59 PM
  #34  

 
andrewhake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mt. ________
Posts: 5,649
Received 96 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ckowalc
Yes, what I'm saying is if you increase preload by 3mm -OR- increase damper length by 3mm, you will increase ride height ~5mm. That is not what Sakebomb's chart is saying but I've thought about it over the weekend and still come to the same conclusion.
Yeah makes sense, the amount of change at the actual wheel will be different compared to the amount of change at the damper mounting point. No need to just stick to theory very easy for anyone to test this for themselves.
Old 03-14-2017, 09:12 AM
  #35  

 
B serious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Illnoise. WAY downtown, jerky.
Posts: 8,088
Received 1,239 Likes on 940 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ckowalc
So I was looking at this a little bit more and Sakebomb's chart says every 3mm of preload added raises ride height ~1.77mm (~0.07 in). This seems to be preload multiplied by motion ratio or 3 * 0.578 = 1.73mm. However, wouldn't it be preload divided by motion ratio or 3 / 0.578 = 5.19mm?

Isn't adding 3mm of preload just like adding 3mm of shock length? Doesn't the change get "magnified" by the length of the control arm?

Maybe I'm having a brain fart?

The shock moves less than the wheel at a ratio of 1.73:1.

1.73" at the wheel/hub is 1.00" at the shock.

So....yes, the ride height should change MORE than the damper length change.
Old 03-14-2017, 03:13 PM
  #36  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
SakeBomb Garage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 866
Received 56 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ckowalc
So I was looking at this a little bit more and Sakebomb's chart says every 3mm of preload added raises ride height ~1.77mm (~0.07 in). This seems to be preload multiplied by motion ratio or 3 * 0.578 = 1.73mm. However, wouldn't it be preload divided by motion ratio or 3 / 0.578 = 5.19mm?

Isn't adding 3mm of preload just like adding 3mm of shock length? Doesn't the change get "magnified" by the length of the control arm?

Maybe I'm having a brain fart?
Good catch, we made a standalone version of our calculator to be able to create this chart and it looks like I fat-fingered it a bit. I will get the the chart updated as soon as I get a chance. Either way the trend is correct, basically a drop of about 3/4 of an inch is possible with our recommended pre-load settings.
Old 03-20-2017, 04:05 AM
  #37  

 
bgoetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,730
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Has this been updated to reflect the correct calculations yet?
Old 04-26-2017, 11:40 AM
  #38  

 
JamesD89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: San Diego
Posts: 734
Received 59 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bgoetz
Has this been updated to reflect the correct calculations yet?
Bump
Old 05-14-2017, 04:38 AM
  #39  

 
bgoetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,730
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

For what it is worth I tossed on 10k springs and 8mm preload and am at 13 inches fender to wheel center in the rear. I think that equates to a 1.25" drop, which was actually .25" more than I was after, so I am adding 3mm preload.
Old 05-14-2017, 04:14 PM
  #40  

 
bgoetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,730
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

I added 4mm length in the front and 4mm preload in the rear. So total I am 12mm rear preload with 10k springs. Final ride height is 13 1/8" front and 13 1/4" rear. The car feels perfect, it couldn't feel better. I will say allowing the shocks more travel really made a massive difference. In my case it was a combination of not scraping fenders in the front and scraping fenders/hitting bump stops in the rear.

Quick Reply: Öhlins DFV Recommended Pre-load vs Ride height - Helpful Chart Inside!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 PM.