S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Kraftwerks Supercharger Dynos

Old 12-12-2013, 01:52 PM
  #101  
Registered User
 
Jmays2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^^^^ Thank you for your honest reply, and as far as power our goals are pretty close Im not shooting for 500 either but I probably will be running e85 because I can get it down the street. I have been looking at everything I can do to help with the mid range because that is what im worried about the most.
Old 12-12-2013, 07:08 PM
  #102  

 
SlowTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,660
Received 176 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

My post largely shares Junky's thought process, no offense intended. Is a rotrex really that much more efficient than a paxton? I've seen people claim that rotrex's are more efficient but the question is really if it's considerable. I'm curious where the extra midrange comes from specifically as I'm interested in a FI setup down the road for road racing. I guess the question is ultimately whether the difference is negligible between the SOS SC kit and a rotrex kit (it seems like it is), but I guess we'll see over time.
Old 12-12-2013, 09:52 PM
  #103  
Registered User

 
2K_S2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry for the newbie question but is this kit (or any others) emissions legal? Locally, there is no sniffer test but they will check OBDII for fault codes.

Appreciate your feedback.

Best regards!
Old 12-13-2013, 06:56 AM
  #104  
Registered User
 
vector01_hungry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the old KW kit doesn't produce any fault codes for a scanner to pick up. I've passed inspection at least twice with mine.
Old 12-13-2013, 07:02 AM
  #105  

 
s2000442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,274
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

It all depends on your ems. Kpro or flashpro will pass obd2. Aem, haltech etc will fail.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
Old 12-13-2013, 09:24 AM
  #106  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SlowTeg
My post largely shares Junky's thought process, no offense intended. Is a rotrex really that much more efficient than a paxton? I've seen people claim that rotrex's are more efficient but the question is really if it's considerable. I'm curious where the extra midrange comes from specifically as I'm interested in a FI setup down the road for road racing. I guess the question is ultimately whether the difference is negligible between the SOS SC kit and a rotrex kit (it seems like it is), but I guess we'll see over time.
I haven’t seen any data comparisons on mid range performance from a c38 compared to a paxton 1200, there may not be, could just be theory. But if you were to base it on a comparison between the c30 Rotrex the old KW kit used and the old Paxton 1000 Comptech used, the difference in Mid range power typically was worth about 1 psi, and since the KW capped out sooner, it wasn’t a problem to offset the performance over the entire power curve with the 1000 at higher boost. We can only deduct from that what the c38 to 1200 might be.

But like anything, bigger blower = more parasitic loss and the added efficiency of either of our comparable blowers may not make up and exceed that loss in heighten power, at a low/mid rpm range you all are after. The c38 could be worse then the c30 in the mid and provide no benefit over the paxton 1200 given a particular boost level, or it could. Matching boost levels is important when making comparisons on the same motor.

But I think if your coming from a mid range monster like the SOS turbo kit Rainh8r just did, any marginal level of mid range the c38 might provide over the 1200 wont be appreciated or possibly even perceived. You have to look at the total package of what the centrifugal kit is providing, which is top end power efficiency, and that’s where you want your engine to be efficient, which ours are. If the rotrex cant deliver up top, I think it will disappoint. If all you are after is sub 400whp with real mid range power, I think a roots style SC is the answer.

I still want to know what the max CFM from the c38 is, to the Paxton 1200 for comparable top end potential.
Old 12-13-2013, 09:40 AM
  #107  

 
RAIN H8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Waukesha, WI
Posts: 4,738
Received 101 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

The data can be found on the rotrex Web page under technical data. I cannot link it as it is a pdf.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4
Old 12-13-2013, 10:21 AM
  #108  
Registered User
 
Jmays2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For the c38-81 the CFM looks to be 1004.44? is that right? and 1150 for the novi 1200
Old 12-13-2013, 11:20 AM
  #109  

 
SlowTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,660
Received 176 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
But I think if your coming from a mid range monster like the SOS turbo kit Rainh8r just did, any marginal level of mid range the c38 might provide over the 1200 wont be appreciated or possibly even perceived. You have to look at the total package of what the centrifugal kit is providing, which is top end power efficiency, and that’s where you want your engine to be efficient, which ours are. If the rotrex cant deliver up top, I think it will disappoint. If all you are after is sub 400whp with real mid range power, I think a roots style SC is the answer.
Oh for sure. I understand the power difference of the SOS turbo vs. SOS supercharger midrange is night and day, and ultimately a roots style blower is THE answer for any road race setup, but the big problem there is that no one makes a kit anymore. There should be a few local SC'd s2ks at the track next year and I'll have to go for a ride along. I hope the KW kit turns out to be a good performer, as the sound of the rotrex over the paxton is a selling point itself.
Old 12-13-2013, 11:48 AM
  #110  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jmays2k
For the c38-81 the CFM looks to be 1004.44? is that right? and 1150 for the novi 1200
That’s a significant difference. Id say about 50hp. The midrange efficiency of the rotrex would have to be pretty significant to even match, let alone offset anything the 1200 could provide at its peak efficiency. I'm thinking it’s the same song and dance between the c30 and old paxton blowers. If you’re not going to run the 1200 at full rpm then the c38 may show an advantage in mid range, how much remains to be seen.

Quick Reply: Kraftwerks Supercharger Dynos



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:35 AM.