Sheepey undivided+GTX3076R-0.83ar or Full Race Twin Scroll+GTX3576-1.06ar?(550-650hp)
#11
Lol. I wonder how old all of us still diehard s2000 fanboys are these days. I dont think the honda love will ever leave my blood lol. Cause now im 30, married and in the process of boosting my beloved s2k. And i know some of u are much older than me with kids and still rockin a 2seater! Lol.
sorry, back on topic.
sorry, back on topic.
The following users liked this post:
MARK AUS S2K (09-14-2017)
#12
Registered User
Thread Starter
H
aha yeah I'm turning 37 soon and my right foot is definitely not as heavy as it used to be!
The Garrett site shows 750hp for both the 3076R and the 3576R. Which is strange!
aha yeah I'm turning 37 soon and my right foot is definitely not as heavy as it used to be!
The Garrett site shows 750hp for both the 3076R and the 3576R. Which is strange!
Last edited by MARK AUS S2K; 01-07-2017 at 05:54 AM.
#13
i am looking for a new turbo.. was thinking on going with the GTX35.. but just not so sure if to go with the 76 or the 82.. kinda like quick spool up... i have a gt3071 now.. love to spool just not enough top end..
#14
Good luck with the build. The 3076 is one of the best turbos out there for this car. You should be able to max out the turbo a little north of 550WHP. 600+ likely won't happen.
You can't go wrong with either Laskey or Inline Pro. Call and talk to both of them, just decide from there.
Based on what I've read on here and some dyno graphs I saw awhile back on a 3071/3076 comparison on an F2*C, the 3076 spools just as fast as the 71 and has more headroom. I don't think there was any drop in responsiveness at all, IIRC.
You can't go wrong with either Laskey or Inline Pro. Call and talk to both of them, just decide from there.
Based on what I've read on here and some dyno graphs I saw awhile back on a 3071/3076 comparison on an F2*C, the 3076 spools just as fast as the 71 and has more headroom. I don't think there was any drop in responsiveness at all, IIRC.
Last edited by Chance S2K; 01-10-2017 at 12:28 PM. Reason: Commented to c_me_go
The following users liked this post:
MARK AUS S2K (09-14-2017)
#16
Those numbers are just rough guidelines. The 3576 will do about 50whp more than the 3076. Notice the 3071 is mislabeled, it should be more like 650 crank hp.
#17
It depends on how much power you want. If you want 600-650whp, then the 3576. If you want 700+whp, then the 3582. This dyno plot is from a STI with everything exactly the same except for 3576 vs. 3582:
It's from this article on turbo sizing:
Turbo Tech: Size Matters!
It's from this article on turbo sizing:
Turbo Tech: Size Matters!
#18
Nice.. well I like the spool up time no the 76.. would just hate to run out of top end if I ever want more.. I have a built motor with E85 and r200 rear.. so I can take the HP and hi boost.. do you know how much boost he was running?
#19
Boost plot is in the article. It's also an STI, so not directly comparable to the S2k.
#20