dynoed - stock vs J's Racing S2k
11-22-2008, 08:19 PM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: COMPTON
Posts: 6,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OMG VTEC,Nov 22 2008, 08:20 PM
lol @ dyno reading comprehension.
That's a lot of money for 10-15whp.
That's a lot of money for 10-15whp.
But nice numbers for a basic N/A mods and tune. nice and simple
11-23-2008, 10:43 AM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OMG VTEC,Nov 22 2008, 08:20 PM
lol @ dyno reading comprehension.
That's a lot of money for 10-15whp.
That's a lot of money for 10-15whp.
Although there are solid gains all across the band, you are getting close to a boost price tag.
11-24-2008, 07:42 PM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mr.domo,Nov 20 2008, 10:22 AM
Great post! I have the parts. Well, almost the same. J's 70RR, SPL Racing Header, spoon snorkel (gutted air box), and Greddy EMU. Unfortunately, I haven't had time to install any of it yet. Postponed until after the winter 
How does she feel on the road? I would like to know how the numbers translate on the street.
By the way I can't tell exactly from the graph readout but it looks like a healthy 250whp/232tq?
How does she feel on the road? I would like to know how the numbers translate on the street.
By the way I can't tell exactly from the graph readout but it looks like a healthy 250whp/232tq?
11-25-2008, 05:17 AM
#15
top graph is wheel hp, bottom graph shows engine hp.
left scale is hp, right is for torque. do note the differences in measurements i.e cv and kgm.
Once again the purpose is to show the difference between a pure stock ap2 vs 1 that has I/H/E bolt ons and ecu reflash.
Going turbo wasnt an option for me, but I will agree that it is defintely more cost effective to go the turbo charged way, especially after seeing a turbo charged car reading on the same dyno.
left scale is hp, right is for torque. do note the differences in measurements i.e cv and kgm.
Once again the purpose is to show the difference between a pure stock ap2 vs 1 that has I/H/E bolt ons and ecu reflash.
Going turbo wasnt an option for me, but I will agree that it is defintely more cost effective to go the turbo charged way, especially after seeing a turbo charged car reading on the same dyno.
01-13-2017, 10:32 AM
#17
Thought i just share a dyno done today on a bone stock s2k, compared to a full J's Racing S2k( Intake/Exhaust/Header + test pipe + ECU reflashed).
I did this to satisfy my own curiousity as I had never done a baseline dyno on my J's car. The aim is to see what differences it makes if any, and to determine for yourself if it is worthwhile.
The only variable/differences I can think so:
1.Both Dyno sessions were done in the evening on different days
2.stock s2k will be the equailvent of the CR version in the States.J's is a MY07 AP2
3.stock s2k running on 255 rear, J's car on 245 rear
Note the dyno was run in 5th gear, as th J's car was skipping too much running in 4th.
p.s its a roller dyno
I did this to satisfy my own curiousity as I had never done a baseline dyno on my J's car. The aim is to see what differences it makes if any, and to determine for yourself if it is worthwhile.
The only variable/differences I can think so:
1.Both Dyno sessions were done in the evening on different days
2.stock s2k will be the equailvent of the CR version in the States.J's is a MY07 AP2
3.stock s2k running on 255 rear, J's car on 245 rear
Note the dyno was run in 5th gear, as th J's car was skipping too much running in 4th.
p.s its a roller dyno
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
s2kpearlwhite
S2000 Modifications and Parts
29
08-12-2008 04:42 AM