S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum Discussions about N/A motor projects, builds and technology.

Swap: K-Series --> S2000

Old 05-24-2016, 08:21 AM
  #11  

 
Mrsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,723
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nabu
Originally Posted by Mrsideways' timestamp='1464097376' post='23975021
First engine being cracked i believe to have happened in shipping yes. It was right at the corner of the block so it would make sense.

2nd engine on Stock S2000 Intake Manifold and Kelford B cams made 241whp. I swapped cams (drag cartel 4's), and intake manifold (excessive 58mm) and it made 272whp.
Attached are the 2 dyno's I had from engine #2.

3rd I had a baffled pan, problem was it wasn't baffled the correct way to stop oil from going up in the timing chain.
That sounds like a lot of power to be on the wheels. Did you also get a reading for crank power, which maybe you remember?

I am curious about how much more loss there is when a K-Series is put in a rwd car like the S2000.

So the K24 is around 300hp at the crank! Nice!

We will see what this engine makes. I'm hoping it makes quite a bit more. But I've learned to just hope it stays running.
Old 05-29-2016, 11:45 AM
  #12  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Nabu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Far far away...
Posts: 8,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default



Anyone else that can shed some light in this topic.

I can't believe that in our community there are only so few people with this swap!!
Old 05-29-2016, 09:05 PM
  #13  
Registered User

 
Aurex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 339
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

There are a few civics that have F series swaps. Check them out for reference since both F and K series are swapped in the Civics.
Old 05-30-2016, 02:09 PM
  #14  
Registered User

 
Mccormick009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have no personal info on this topic but I am very interested in how it works out. I am looking at K24 if and when my f22 should tire out.
I can say that Alex from Ballade Sports has a k24 in an AP2 chassis. I don't have all the details but I believe he has handsome oil issues on track. Whether serious or not I'm not sure but he might be a good resource to check with.
Old 05-30-2016, 02:38 PM
  #15  

 
Apex1.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Hmmm, what's the downside to a lsx conversion? Weight I would guess, but the k20 must weigh more than the f20 right?

Love the f20, but if you need something that is dead reliable, cheap and makes more than enough power, consider a lsx swap. K20 is nice but not enough of a step up from the f20 to make it worth it. IMO
Old 05-31-2016, 06:57 AM
  #16  
Registered User

 
HUNTERANGEL121's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Miami
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Apex1.0
Hmmm, what's the downside to a lsx conversion? Weight I would guess, but the k20 must weigh more than the f20 right?

Love the f20, but if you need something that is dead reliable, cheap and makes more than enough power, consider a lsx swap. K20 is nice but not enough of a step up from the f20 to make it worth it. IMO
Apparently an lsx swap is 100lbs less or more than stock. Not sure how accurate that is.
Old 05-31-2016, 08:05 AM
  #17  

 
Mrsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,723
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

If I had to do it over again, it would have an LSX or I'd really like to try a 370z swap. But no money and no more time to play with mine. It's going on the dyno in a couple hours. My wife would absolutely love it if I sold it. Issue is with everything else in the car I've got $50k + in it and selling it I'd be lucky to get half that.
Old 05-31-2016, 09:12 AM
  #18  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Apex1.0
Hmmm, what's the downside to a lsx conversion? Weight I would guess, but the k20 must weigh more than the f20 right?

Love the f20, but if you need something that is dead reliable, cheap and makes more than enough power, consider a lsx swap. K20 is nice but not enough of a step up from the f20 to make it worth it. IMO
Looks like a step down to me. Add in the reliability headaches and I'm not sure why anyone would bother. The F series is a unique/specific motor for the s which performs better out of the box, seems a shame to neuter the s because one cant afford a decent low mile used F series to swap in.
Old 05-31-2016, 09:14 AM
  #19  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HUNTERANGEL121
Originally Posted by Apex1.0
Hmmm, what's the downside to a lsx conversion? Weight I would guess, but the k20 must weigh more than the f20 right?

Love the f20, but if you need something that is dead reliable, cheap and makes more than enough power, consider a lsx swap. K20 is nice but not enough of a step up from the f20 to make it worth it. IMO
Apparently an lsx swap is 100lbs less or more than stock. Not sure how accurate that is.
Its not, they are 50lb more. I'm not sure how much more the T56 trans is you would want to swap in with the engine, but still the weight of this swap is centralized in chassis and comparable to the weight of a Turbo or SC set up, so its not really a detriment when you also consider the power increase.
Old 05-31-2016, 09:31 AM
  #20  

 
Mrsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,723
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
Originally Posted by Apex1.0' timestamp='1464647926' post='23980307
Hmmm, what's the downside to a lsx conversion? Weight I would guess, but the k20 must weigh more than the f20 right?

Love the f20, but if you need something that is dead reliable, cheap and makes more than enough power, consider a lsx swap. K20 is nice but not enough of a step up from the f20 to make it worth it. IMO
Looks like a step down to me. Add in the reliability headaches and I'm not sure why anyone would bother. The F series is a unique/specific motor for the s which performs better out of the box, seems a shame to neuter the s because one cant afford a decent low mile used F series to swap in.
Not entirely true. The K is the next gen motor to the F. It has VTC. But it's surprisingly similar under the valve cover. The Non-FRM cylinder walls make it cheaper/easier to deal with piston changes. It also has VTC and (atleast when I did mine) a lot more aftermarket support. The F has better timing chain setup then the K that's for sure, but the way the F's timing chain is done you can't have VTC without heavy modifications. A K24 with very very light mods will out perform an F with light mods. Bascially a VTC change to 50 degrees and the obvious things needed for the swap (intake manifold and exhaust header) will yield you in the 240-250whp range on an otherwise stock motor with 30-40 ft/lbs more tq then a F22. But from there it gets expensive. The K heads don't flow as well as the F head. So a better head and or head porting is needed. The K rods are not going to like 8000rpm plus and neither will the cast pistons so you need rods and pistons to go beyond. The OEM cams are out of steam at 250whp so you need cams, which then means you need valve springs. So 250 is easy... 260 is building a motor. But 260 and 280 or 300 etc are the sameish price.

At the same time the K series has a taller block and that helps the rod ratio a bunch compared to the F24 stroker. 152mm rod vs a 145mm rod is a healthy difference in a good way.

Quick Reply: Swap: K-Series --> S2000



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:14 AM.