S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

s2k reliable?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-22-2017, 07:49 PM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
rpg51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,295
Received 256 Likes on 219 Posts
Default s2k reliable?

We read a lot about folks who run into significant mechanical trouble with their s2ks - over rev valve problems, tight valve problems and the like on this forum. Let's hear from folks who have experienced essentially trouble free operation for long periods of time. I have to think there are many of you out there. I have had zero trouble with my s2k. Of course, I haven't over rev'd the engine either. And, mine is a low mileage car. What about you?
Old 03-22-2017, 07:56 PM
  #2  

 
SoFlaKidd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 178
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I got my LPB 08 with 116k on it in Dec of 15 and now it has 136k so 20k miles in the last year and only major issue i've had was a dead battery
Old 03-22-2017, 07:59 PM
  #3  

 
Singh_snisen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Iv had an S2k with over 200k and tracked it every month. It was bulletproof. Just like a any other Honda, it's very reliable.
Old 03-22-2017, 08:07 PM
  #4  

 
Nerd-Vol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 424
Received 33 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Knock on wood, my 2004 has been in the family since new, no major issues. Oil changes, fluid changes, one or two batteries, tires, and brakes. It's got 62,500 on the clock, with about 7,000 of them mine. I wish I asked dad what services he did and did not have done, among so many other things.

Im going to try and get a valve adjustment this year.

I like to go to the dragon a few times a year, and it sees vtec on a regular basis. This car needs to be pushed to have real fun, and I'm not afraid to do so!

Last edited by Nerd-Vol; 03-23-2017 at 01:47 PM.
Old 03-22-2017, 09:09 PM
  #5  

 
cosmomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Foothills East of Sacramento
Posts: 5,598
Received 1,561 Likes on 927 Posts
Default

Nothing mechanical. 62K miles. 2009.
That being said, I think preemptive maintenance has saved me from some real headaches. Rear axle TSB. Valves WERE tight and saved them from being torched 20K miles ago.
Changing out fluids, bleed brakes, clutch, etc saves you from problems later. Keep up on it, don't abuse the car and it should do very well.
Old 03-22-2017, 09:27 PM
  #6  
Registered User

 
s2cho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,944
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Got mine with 60k miles and is now at 115k in about 6 years, never broke down on me and I dont think it will for a while lol. Have had some issues with some misfire here and there but thats expected we dont have a fuel filter (clogged injectors for me). People who have trouble are the ones who are clueless and dont take care of important maintenance then go beat the living hell out of the car and cry when something breaks.
Old 03-22-2017, 09:42 PM
  #7  

 
windhund116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10,313
Received 1,424 Likes on 954 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rpg51
We read a lot about folks who run into significant mechanical trouble with their s2ks - over rev valve problems, tight valve problems and the like on this forum. Let's hear from folks who have experienced essentially trouble free operation for long periods of time. I have to think there are many of you out there. I have had zero trouble with my s2k. Of course, I haven't over rev'd the engine either. And, mine is a low mileage car. What about you?
Well... any car --- even a mega-buck, super sports car --- is going to have issues, if you run past redline. Other than keeping an eye on valve clearance and getting a good timing chain tensioner --- no weird peccadilloes like other sports cars. Can't think of many cars of this genre regularly hitting 100-150K miles.
Old 03-23-2017, 02:30 AM
  #8  

 
Chuck S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chesterfield VA
Posts: 12,528
Received 1,132 Likes on 995 Posts
Default

Driver stupidity will trump reliability in some cases.

Downshifting to slow the car rather than use the brakes was necessary before the advent of disc brakes. That era ended with the circa 1953 Jaguar C-type ... But it's still something sports car drivers think is necessary or sporty.

-- Chuck
Old 03-23-2017, 05:46 AM
  #9  

 
Conedodger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 13,468
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

I'm the original owner of a 2003 AP1. Started autocrossing it heavily with 700 miles on the clock. 15-20 events a year. 6K rpm launches on Hoosier R-compounds for years. The car currently has 60K miles on it. Last year I replaced my first factory part...the 13 year old battery. I still have the original brake pads and rotors in the car. This is the most reliable car I have owned in my 40 years of driving.
Old 03-23-2017, 06:14 AM
  #10  

 
cosmomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Foothills East of Sacramento
Posts: 5,598
Received 1,561 Likes on 927 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Conedodger
This is the most reliable car I have owned in my 40 years of driving.
Time will tell. My first car, a 64 Dodge Coronet 440, was sold with 265K miles on it. One starter and clutch. That was it.


Quick Reply: s2k reliable?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:32 PM.