17" 949 Racing 6UL wheels in production
#13
Community Organizer
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: America !!! fuk yeah.
Posts: 5,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
I have stock front fenders.
I like the 17x9 55 option for the front. I don't see how they will fit.
I want to run 245 size with 3degress camber using an adjustable upper arm. Do you think I will have an issue hitting the fender and or liner ?
How about the rear 17x10 with 255 tire and 2 deg camber ? Rear is rolled and tab moved.
Thanks.
I like the 17x9 55 option for the front. I don't see how they will fit.
I want to run 245 size with 3degress camber using an adjustable upper arm. Do you think I will have an issue hitting the fender and or liner ?
How about the rear 17x10 with 255 tire and 2 deg camber ? Rear is rolled and tab moved.
Thanks.
#14
We also build a 17x9 +48 , 17.4 lbs for the 2006-2015 Mazda MX5 and many Japanese sedans. This offset on an S2000 tends to rub outboard a bit even with full race camber. More bump steer, rubbing and tire scrub so we generally don’t recommend it. We know the +48 looks cool but they will rub.
#15
Moderator
We also build a 17x9 +48 , 17.4 lbs for the 2006-2015 Mazda MX5 and many Japanese sedans. This offset on an S2000 tends to rub outboard a bit even with full race camber. More bump steer, rubbing and tire scrub so we generally don’t recommend it. We know the +48 looks cool but they will rub.