Mugen MF10 back in production!
#121
#122
#125
But yes the added benefit of wider tires is good too (although i only plan to run 255). I never wanted to give up my 17x9.5 CE28's for S2k spec MF10, but it was a no brainer when King offered the 17x9.
#127
I'm not positive, but i think they're all the same face, maybe just variances in lip depth if anything. The 9" wide have more brake clearance for sure though, which must be due to a deeper hub.
But yes the added benefit of wider tires is good too (although i only plan to run 255). I never wanted to give up my 17x9.5 CE28's for S2k spec MF10, but it was a no brainer when King offered the 17x9.
But yes the added benefit of wider tires is good too (although i only plan to run 255). I never wanted to give up my 17x9.5 CE28's for S2k spec MF10, but it was a no brainer when King offered the 17x9.
#128
I'm not positive, but i think they're all the same face, maybe just variances in lip depth if anything. The 9" wide have more brake clearance for sure though, which must be due to a deeper hub.
But yes the added benefit of wider tires is good too (although i only plan to run 255). I never wanted to give up my 17x9.5 CE28's for S2k spec MF10, but it was a no brainer when King offered the 17x9.
But yes the added benefit of wider tires is good too (although i only plan to run 255). I never wanted to give up my 17x9.5 CE28's for S2k spec MF10, but it was a no brainer when King offered the 17x9.
Thanks. Anything special on getting them to fit? Also, what size tires were you planning on running?
#129