And just when we though that, maybe the new Honda’s CEO will reconsider the decision of previous CEO Takeo Fukui plans for the NSX successor, a shocking statement by Ito has put as down. Takanubo Ito said that “I don’t think we need a classic front-engine, rear-drive car. It would be meaningless to emulate what other companies have done for more than five decades. We are considering incorporating new engines, motors, transmissions and chassis into mid- to large-sized hybrid vehicles.”
He has also confirmed that V8 engines and rear wheel driving are not a part of Honda’s future.
Related posts:
- Honda S2000 successor could be hybrid with all wheel drive Some things will never change, and rumors want an S2000...
- Honda’s Safe Driving Educational Software Honda has combined new educational software for safe driving together...
- DIY Replacing the rear console cover The trim of the console cover is known to be...
- My S2000 has worsened my driving skills (opinion piece by Onehots2k) I have had my S2000 for almost six years. I...
- Honda S2000 Engine powers up a 1977 Toyota Celica We’ve seen a lot of S2000 engines into other cars,...
on Jul 21st, 2009 at 9:54 am
It’s “as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened. “
on Jul 21st, 2009 at 9:31 pm
Wow. Really? I guess. Go ahead and pull off a Toyota on us. Fail. Well actually Toyota IS still working on sports cars like a the LF-A and Lexus “-F” models
on Jan 19th, 2010 at 12:44 pm
He’s just pissed because the S2000 was a lot of FAIL in the marketplace.
Don’t get me wrong, I loved the S2000 for what it was, a VERY light, hi-revving convertible that was a blast (and fast) to drive. But the market didn’t jump on it. Why?
Because the market Honda would sell to wants more torque (a turbo V6 in the S2000 would’ve done it). They also want SEXY. Again, don’t misunderstand, I really liked the S2000, but it lacked any kind of hotness, visually. It was rather pedestrian in looks, compared to its competition. When I saw it I didn’t say “gotta have”, like say the Mustang did, or the retro Challenger today.
He’s also denying these realities:
Front Engine/Rear Drive > Front Drive. Period. Front engine/rear drive gives you much better weight distribution (why the Vette uses a transaxle rather than a trans and differential setup). Front drive suffers from understeer, and it’s simply harder to get the ideal suspension geometries with front drive than with rear drive.
Can you get good geometry w/front drive? Yes, just look at Honda. Is it harder to do? Is it as much fun to drive or as predictable as rear drive – not to me it isn’t.
What Honda is focusing on is all-wheel drive instead of front drive. OK. Fine. I just can’t wait for someone to produce a chip/controller that enables me to make my mostly front-drive Ridgeline into a mostly rear-drive.