Datalog Request - DBW S2000 - Throttle Tip-In
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Datalog Request - DBW S2000 - Throttle Tip-In
I'm writing here to hopefully get some support from the DBW S2000 community in gathering datalogs of a specific scenario. A lot of us are struggling with hesitation during throttle tip-in as can be read in the following threads.
https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/112...edy-solutions/
https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/871...on-at-low-rpm/
https://www.hondata.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17928
Can a few people with a FlashPro run the following test procedure and upload logs? Also state whether you feel the car experiences any hesitation or not during throttle tip-in
Start Log.
Hold 10% throttle for 4 seconds.
Change to 40% throttle quickly then hold for 4 seconds.
End Log.
Thanks for your time.
https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/112...edy-solutions/
https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/871...on-at-low-rpm/
https://www.hondata.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17928
Can a few people with a FlashPro run the following test procedure and upload logs? Also state whether you feel the car experiences any hesitation or not during throttle tip-in
Start Log.
Hold 10% throttle for 4 seconds.
Change to 40% throttle quickly then hold for 4 seconds.
End Log.
Thanks for your time.
#2
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
No worries, lots to read there. The following picture should summarize in less than 1000 words...
#4
Originally Posted by Gernby' timestamp='1435092941' post='23657947
No worries, lots to read there. The following picture should summarize in less than 1000 words...
Here is an updated screen shot, which shows the "new style" knock tables.
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
You think retarding ignition by 5 degrees is causing the AFR to drift 2 whole points lean?! And why doesn't the AFR stay lean afterwards? You can see the STFT goes away and returns to 0 with this 'retarded ignition' theory of yours.
And yes, I've read through that and associated threads a lot. I have a good understanding and I agree it is mislabeled as 'knock retard' when it should be called an 'octane ignition trim' as you stated in your posts.
Are you going to post datalogs of the test I suggested?
And yes, I've read through that and associated threads a lot. I have a good understanding and I agree it is mislabeled as 'knock retard' when it should be called an 'octane ignition trim' as you stated in your posts.
Are you going to post datalogs of the test I suggested?
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Gernby' timestamp='1435092941' post='23657947
Not to mention, the AFR starts drifting lean WAY before it hits those 4 cells that are part of your 'retarded ignition' theory which are close to atmospheric pressure.
The AFR starts drifting lean as soon as MAP starts increasing quickly. Keep in mind the AFR line has a slight time lag so shift it to the left a bit to see it more in tune with combustion AFR.
#7
You think retarding ignition by 5 degrees is causing the AFR to drift 2 whole points lean?! And why doesn't the AFR stay lean afterwards? You can see the STFT goes away and returns to 0 with this 'retarded ignition' theory of yours.
And yes, I've read through that and associated threads a lot. I have a good understanding and I agree it is mislabeled as 'knock retard' when it should be called an 'octane ignition trim' as you stated in your posts.
Are you going to post datalogs of the test I suggested?
And yes, I've read through that and associated threads a lot. I have a good understanding and I agree it is mislabeled as 'knock retard' when it should be called an 'octane ignition trim' as you stated in your posts.
Are you going to post datalogs of the test I suggested?
I'm running DBW ITB's now, so my datalogs wouldn't be very helpful to you.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by shind3' timestamp='1435098589' post='23658047
[quote name='Gernby' timestamp='1435092941' post='23657947']
I believe this is the issue and fix.
https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/783...s-in-flashpro/
I believe this is the issue and fix.
https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/783...s-in-flashpro/
Not to mention, the AFR starts drifting lean WAY before it hits those 4 cells that are part of your 'retarded ignition' theory which are close to atmospheric pressure.
The AFR starts drifting lean as soon as MAP starts increasing quickly. Keep in mind the AFR line has a slight time lag so shift it to the left a bit to see it more in tune with combustion AFR.
[/quote]
You know I'm a eTuner, right? I've tuned over 100 '06+ S2000's on FlashPro, so I do know a bit about this. I'm not saying that the IGN retard is causing your lean AFR. I'm saying that IGN retard is much more likely to cause your symptoms.
#9
Registered User
Thread Starter
Do you agree that an AFR change to about 17 is a problem?
I have been tuning engines since 2005. Mostly Subaru engines but this isn't my first rodeo either.
Are you going to post logs as requested in the first post of this thread? That is really the point of this thread. If you want to discuss otherwise, there are 2 other threads I linked to which might be more suitable.
I have been tuning engines since 2005. Mostly Subaru engines but this isn't my first rodeo either.
Are you going to post logs as requested in the first post of this thread? That is really the point of this thread. If you want to discuss otherwise, there are 2 other threads I linked to which might be more suitable.
#10
Do you agree that an AFR change to about 17 is a problem?
I have been tuning engines since 2005. Mostly Subaru engines but this isn't my first rodeo either.
Are you going to post logs as requested in the first post of this thread? That is really the point of this thread. If you want to discuss otherwise, there are 2 other threads I linked to which might be more suitable.
I have been tuning engines since 2005. Mostly Subaru engines but this isn't my first rodeo either.
Are you going to post logs as requested in the first post of this thread? That is really the point of this thread. If you want to discuss otherwise, there are 2 other threads I linked to which might be more suitable.
I don't have any experience with Subarus, so I don't even know if they are MAP based.
I'm not going to post datalogs of my ITB setup, since anything you find in them would just misguide you.
I personally just think you WANT it to be an AFR issue, and that is getting in the way of you resolving the actual problem.
Is there some reason why you don't want to fix the problem with your knock control, which is gleamingly obvious in your datalog?