New short engine
#1
Posted 03 August 2001 - 11:08 AM
#2
Posted 03 August 2001 - 11:31 AM
'03 CTR30AE Nighthawk Black, No R-20074
'00 Silverstone/Red gone to new pastures.
#3
Posted 03 August 2001 - 11:47 AM
I would be banging down the door of Honda U.K. demanding a replacement car.
Have you tried this route ?
I am sure Honda would hate their excellent image to be tarnished in public.
Good luck.
Stooker forever :thumbup:
:D :monkey:
#4
Posted 06 August 2001 - 04:17 AM
As a side issue I think the 0-60 times on the car are exagerated there is no way you can get mine to 60 in Autocars 5.5. The clutch is not good enough, or perhaps the modified clutches have compromised the cars performance.
#5
Posted 09 August 2001 - 05:27 AM
Certainly sounds like you've been through the mill as well, the numbers seem to be growing!
My own problems started in April following a 9k service, see threads passum, following the post service fire :eek:, which the dealer took responsibility for I waited two months for a short engine to be fitted. The seems OK but I now have noisy, sticky clutch/gearbox problems. The dealer advises that they will change the clutch and gearbox as a precautionary measure!!! On top of that the front rims have started to pit and my windscreen went west on Tuesday!!
......but apart from all that I still think it's fantastic :D
Silver Red
#6
Posted 09 August 2001 - 06:46 AM
I think my car is definately related to yours. They are definately twins!
had idential clutch problem. Collecting my car today with a new short block, new cat, new redigned clutch set. had 3 cluthes previouly fitted.
I have lost around 4-5 weeks of ownership based on problems.
If the car is not right today and cannot be fixed next week, its going to be world war 3 pretty soon, and honda will be on the receiving end BIG TIME.
I think users on this website should compile a document with all the faults experienced for each individual car.
Honda must be making a big loss on this model. They must be planning to roll production for a couple of years if they are going to break even.
How can a design like this rock with the porche's, bmw's, and merc's in our current time.
I would prefer if the car had 200 BHP and had good reliability.
2002 should be the year!
RL
#7
Posted 09 August 2001 - 07:11 AM
[B]Colin
50+mpg, boring but cheap as chips
#8
Posted 09 August 2001 - 09:17 AM
Vortech SC, lots of other go-fast and/or light-weight stuff (318 RWHP). Now if I can just lose 20-30 pounds off of ME, it'll be even faster. Only other problem is total lack of driving skill. Oh well .... :-(
SURVIVOR OF:
Spring '01 Ohio Valley Run;
Fall '02 Ohio Valley Madison, IN Run;
Fall '02 Dragon;
Spring '03 Wake The Dragon;
Spring '03 Ohio valley S2k/NSX Run;
Spring '03 Evolution Phase I & II AutoX School
Spring '03 Southern IN (Brown County)Run;
Summer '05 Dragon
#9
Posted 09 August 2001 - 09:24 AM
#10
Posted 09 August 2001 - 09:36 AM
[B]They agreed that it sounded over tappety ( if there is such a word
--
2001 S2000 Siver/Red (Sold)
2001 CBR600F :LOL:
1997 Prelude 2.2 VTI Motegi
#12
Posted 09 August 2001 - 10:22 AM
#13
Posted 09 August 2001 - 11:18 AM

Help












