s2000 with iVTEC
#22
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: orange county
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Siggy,Jul 5 2009, 09:57 PM
i request a build thread or something ASAP
#23
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: orange county
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ABCVTEC,Jul 5 2009, 10:13 PM
Build thread won't be necessary. When he gets it running it'll be all over turbomagazine.com again haha
#24
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: orange county
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVAN&MONICA,Jul 6 2009, 08:30 AM
Is there any plausable advantage for doing this over just doing a Vafc (or other) Tune and just lowering to around 4k?
#25
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: orange county
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=LostMotion,Jul 5 2009, 04:16 PM]Having played with cam gears quite a bit, I don't think having variable cam timing on the intake would be very advantageous considering the cost to get a system working.
#26
Hey brother if you can do it I'm open to the results.
I'm just guessing it won't be much help in a canyon or on a road course, I can keep my revs in a 2,500 RPM band quite easily. I have manual gears on my car and have seen what the changes do in certain rev bands. I personally can't advance my intake cam much because of a milled head, but others have done about 10 crank degrees. I know there is a benefit to optimizing the cam timing across the RPM band, but adding 5 ft-lbs of TQ at 4500 RPMs is of zero value to me, and I wouldn't pay $2-4k for it that's for sure. There would be some very minimal gain in power from optimizing 6500 RPMs versus 8000 RPMs, but that would be very small.
I think this system would shine for a daily driver, which is probably why the RSX has the system, to make the car more drivable.
I'm just guessing it won't be much help in a canyon or on a road course, I can keep my revs in a 2,500 RPM band quite easily. I have manual gears on my car and have seen what the changes do in certain rev bands. I personally can't advance my intake cam much because of a milled head, but others have done about 10 crank degrees. I know there is a benefit to optimizing the cam timing across the RPM band, but adding 5 ft-lbs of TQ at 4500 RPMs is of zero value to me, and I wouldn't pay $2-4k for it that's for sure. There would be some very minimal gain in power from optimizing 6500 RPMs versus 8000 RPMs, but that would be very small.
I think this system would shine for a daily driver, which is probably why the RSX has the system, to make the car more drivable.
#28
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: orange county
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by S2Kage,Jul 6 2009, 12:05 PM
so let me get this straight, your making I-vtec into the F-head?
#29
Is the iVTEC system run off of Oil pressure or....? I know its different but I used to own and tune a SVT focus and the VCT was oil actuated. I would be curious how, in general terms, this can work.