Return of the S2000.....
12-12-2012, 07:55 AM
#21
Originally Posted by SCZ4' timestamp='1355254609' post='22203850
I like to think I've remained realistic as to the capabilities of the S2000, the great bits and the not so good bits. I think most of the views on PH are a fair reflection. We all know the great bits, engine, looks, gearbox, noise...... But without a doubt the lack of steering feel is definitely the cars biggest disappoinement and really makes for nervous driving at 9/10ths or 10/10ths. Gearing could also be improved, shorter ratios with a tall 6th would be better.
For me, it's hard to be optimistic that a new S2000 will be as good as the original. Every manufacturer, except for Porsche are going the wrong way, getting heavier and turbo engines... Such a shame.
For me, it's hard to be optimistic that a new S2000 will be as good as the original. Every manufacturer, except for Porsche are going the wrong way, getting heavier and turbo engines... Such a shame.
I too find it hard to imagine that Honda are capible of producing anything modern that would match the S2000.
Times are changing, but I really hope I'm wrong!
12-12-2012, 08:06 AM
#22
I was saying a while back, that if was returning to a performance car, you cannot ignore the Porsche if you can afford to run one/have a dependable and extremely cheap Indy to look after it.
12-12-2012, 09:23 AM
#23
Originally Posted by E4RTH WORM JIM' timestamp='1355323472' post='22205345
[quote name='SCZ4' timestamp='1355254609' post='22203850']
I like to think I've remained realistic as to the capabilities of the S2000, the great bits and the not so good bits. I think most of the views on PH are a fair reflection. We all know the great bits, engine, looks, gearbox, noise...... But without a doubt the lack of steering feel is definitely the cars biggest disappoinement and really makes for nervous driving at 9/10ths or 10/10ths. Gearing could also be improved, shorter ratios with a tall 6th would be better.
For me, it's hard to be optimistic that a new S2000 will be as good as the original. Every manufacturer, except for Porsche are going the wrong way, getting heavier and turbo engines... Such a shame.
I like to think I've remained realistic as to the capabilities of the S2000, the great bits and the not so good bits. I think most of the views on PH are a fair reflection. We all know the great bits, engine, looks, gearbox, noise...... But without a doubt the lack of steering feel is definitely the cars biggest disappoinement and really makes for nervous driving at 9/10ths or 10/10ths. Gearing could also be improved, shorter ratios with a tall 6th would be better.
For me, it's hard to be optimistic that a new S2000 will be as good as the original. Every manufacturer, except for Porsche are going the wrong way, getting heavier and turbo engines... Such a shame.
I too find it hard to imagine that Honda are capible of producing anything modern that would match the S2000.
Times are changing, but I really hope I'm wrong!
[/quote]
Me four.
We'll get a better idea from the new Beat and the new NSX, but with Honda/Acura's recent litany of balls-ups and ever-increasing fascist legislation, I think the era for such mental cars is now passed. Or past...
Having said that, I've recently heard that the cancelled S3000 was due to use essentally 6/10 of the big GT's engine. Whether it would have turned out to be (or may yet turn out to be) a sort of wa(ta)nabe SLK, is moot.
12-12-2012, 11:54 AM
#24
I'll bet my S now that if a new 2000 is released, it will be a hybrid. It's inevitable with future develops from Honda. But on a positive note, will make me love mine even more 
12-12-2012, 11:58 AM
#25
Dear, dear, dear PH, RIP
12-12-2012, 01:26 PM
#27
I wouldnt go within 20 miles if a Honda dealer currently, your idea would make it 100
12-12-2012, 01:50 PM
#28
Have you taken a look at the weight of a folding tin top MX5 over the cloth one - there's barely anything in it.
2.0 Roadster Coupe = 1117 kg
2.0 Convertible = 1080 kg
It's really not that much of a big deal. If you have an S2000 with the hardtop fitted AND the softtop folder underneath, i'd bet the weight gain is about the same.
2.0 Roadster Coupe = 1117 kg
2.0 Convertible = 1080 kg
It's really not that much of a big deal. If you have an S2000 with the hardtop fitted AND the softtop folder underneath, i'd bet the weight gain is about the same.
12-12-2012, 02:00 PM
#29
Originally Posted by Dembo' timestamp='1355239041' post='22203158
I always thought the lack of metal folding roof was one of the few things that really dates the S2000.
I reckon they'll do something small, folding roof, and FWD. Think Vauxhall Tigra.
I reckon they'll do something small, folding roof, and FWD. Think Vauxhall Tigra.
I wouldnt go within 20 miles if a Honda dealer currently, your idea would make it 100
Tigra?? FWD?? Metal roof?? 
If only there was an emoticon blowing its brains out with a shotgun...
12-13-2012, 01:49 AM
#30
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Wales
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have you taken a look at the weight of a folding tin top MX5 over the cloth one - there's barely anything in it.
2.0 Roadster Coupe = 1117 kg
2.0 Convertible = 1080 kg
It's really not that much of a big deal. If you have an S2000 with the hardtop fitted AND the softtop folder underneath, i'd bet the weight gain is about the same.
2.0 Roadster Coupe = 1117 kg
2.0 Convertible = 1080 kg
It's really not that much of a big deal. If you have an S2000 with the hardtop fitted AND the softtop folder underneath, i'd bet the weight gain is about the same.