AusS2000

Not worth the paper they're not printed on.

Beaver

I f you want to sue the vendor of the fake law degree I am now qualified in Michigan (as of this morning) so let me know.

fisting dwarves

duh, you can't sue him, he didn't put anything in writing

WhiteAP1

LOL u guys r funny. All i meant was to delete the thread, get rid of the possible problem, just like u sugested Fisty. If its no longer on the net,(written anywhere on the net) theres no longer a problem. I wasnt implying not written = no defamation. Hotmail covered Libel and slander quite a few years ago now.

fisting dwarves

Gold star with sprinkles for you. You're right, you weren't implying it. You stated it explicitly.

WhiteAP1

"As stated above delete the threads, ban him and forget about it. If its not written anywhere(meaning if it doesnt physically exist in this instance) its not defamation".

Ure taking me out of conext,and theres nothing explicit about it. Have another read.

Vuey

if this keeps going ,theres gonna be a case of defamation on here

dont let some bickering on some other forum ruin our harmony on here

Beaver

FD you'll have a field day with this one.

PPS

(PPS=Post preservation society)

WhiteAP1

Am i missing something,??? all i was doing was agree with fisty in the first place. "As stated above" is refering to Fistys post about deleting the thread and baning him etc....

fisting dwarves

Dare I say it: the ability to process information logically?

First you say that if something is not written anywhere, then it can't be defamatory. Seems pretty explicit to me.

Then you say that you were not implying that something not written could not be defamatory. Let's put aside the triple negative, which is a feat in itself, and concentrate on your assertion- dude, WTF? Damn straight you didn't imply it: you said it explicitly! Refer previous paragraph.

Maybe iit's all just a communication breakdown. So, let's follow Vuey's suggestion and call a truce. Anyone who owns a GPW/red can't be all bad.

xx
FD