s2k vs ITR
08-07-2006, 08:20 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
s2k vs ITR
S2K vs ITR
i have owned a turbo charged teg and eat ITR's like nothign and i still think the s2k goes just as good if not better
thats the question
you should og on ozhonda and see the domestics im having with these ITR guys
i know the S2k will brat the ITR down up and sideways ... they say the S2K is a luxury car not built for track ... WTF?
i have owned a turbo charged teg and eat ITR's like nothign and i still think the s2k goes just as good if not better
thats the question
you should og on ozhonda and see the domestics im having with these ITR guys
i know the S2k will brat the ITR down up and sideways ... they say the S2K is a luxury car not built for track ... WTF?
08-07-2006, 08:26 PM
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont think ITR is that much slower then the s2k.
luxury and not built for track. Probably a s2k hater, I dont think he has ever been in one or doesn't know what his talking about.
luxury and not built for track. Probably a s2k hater, I dont think he has ever been in one or doesn't know what his talking about.
08-07-2006, 08:36 PM
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i told them s2k doesnt have a clock or a glove box so they should shut up
i know ITR goes hard but the s2k goes much more better
might not rev up as quick but [ick up a bette power gain then a fwd full stop.
on the 1/4 mile i believe the S2K is approx 1 second faster then the ITR
the 50/50 weight distribution just handles better and with LSD it assists sharp turns
i know ITR goes hard but the s2k goes much more better
might not rev up as quick but [ick up a bette power gain then a fwd full stop.
on the 1/4 mile i believe the S2K is approx 1 second faster then the ITR
the 50/50 weight distribution just handles better and with LSD it assists sharp turns
08-07-2006, 08:40 PM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sutherland Shire
Posts: 5,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_2000,Aug 8 2006, 02:20 PM
S2K vs ITR
i have owned a turbo charged teg and eat ITR's like nothign and i still think the s2k goes just as good if not better
i have owned a turbo charged teg and eat ITR's like nothign and i still think the s2k goes just as good if not better
thats the question
you should og on ozhonda and see the domestics im having with these ITR guys
you should og on ozhonda and see the domestics im having with these ITR guys
i know the S2k will brat the ITR down up and sideways ... they say the S2K is a luxury car not built for track ... WTF?
I would love to join in on the debate on ozhonda , but it'll just end in tears
08-07-2006, 09:14 PM
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sutherland Shire
Posts: 5,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_2000,Aug 8 2006, 02:20 PM
ill send oyu the link seen you on ozhonda buddy
oh , majority of the threads just turn into bitch fights . Really dont want to do that . Everyone can have an opinion
i have owned a turbo charged teg
what you getting around in these days ? as you speak of it in past tense .
Trending Topics
08-07-2006, 10:23 PM
#8
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by robert112,Aug 7 2006, 10:16 PM
ozhonda morons claim their cars are faster than wrx's stock for stock down the 1/4.
Even if its like a civic with an exhaust "i munched another wrx"
their brainless morons.
Even if its like a civic with an exhaust "i munched another wrx"
their brainless morons.
08-07-2006, 11:31 PM
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont think ITR is that much slower then the s2k.
S2000 is about 1sec quicker to 100kph, and over 400m. To 200kph the S2000 is over 5sec qucker.
On the track the S2000 is about 2.5sec quicker around Winton, and 3.5sec quicker around Phillip Island.
Times from a pro driving both cars the same day.
ps. IT-R is a fast car, but not as fast as S2000. Those extra 30kW and RWD platform have to show their benefits somewhere.
ozhonda morons claim their cars are faster than wrx's stock for stock down the 1/4.
If we're talking about both cars launced well, then the IT-R does not stand a chance from a standing start. There'll be good 10 car-lenghts difference in the WRX's favour. Stock WRXs can run (very) low 14s. IT-R will be lucky to brake into 14s.
On the other hand from a roll IT-R does have a good chance, and in particular over 140kph the IT-R should be quicker.
S2000 is about 1sec quicker to 100kph, and over 400m. To 200kph the S2000 is over 5sec qucker.
On the track the S2000 is about 2.5sec quicker around Winton, and 3.5sec quicker around Phillip Island.
Times from a pro driving both cars the same day.
ps. IT-R is a fast car, but not as fast as S2000. Those extra 30kW and RWD platform have to show their benefits somewhere.
ozhonda morons claim their cars are faster than wrx's stock for stock down the 1/4.
If we're talking about both cars launced well, then the IT-R does not stand a chance from a standing start. There'll be good 10 car-lenghts difference in the WRX's favour. Stock WRXs can run (very) low 14s. IT-R will be lucky to brake into 14s.
On the other hand from a roll IT-R does have a good chance, and in particular over 140kph the IT-R should be quicker.