06 Honda Civic Si First Public Dyno
|
Same folks who got 220+ on an 04. :rolleyes:
|
At first I was like....DAMN......but......Like Steve posted....
that dyno reads really high compared to most. My tweaked S2000 only reads 193 on James Evans Dynopac....but somehow a stock S2000 reads 215+ on Shawns...... |
depends on who you trust....and who's methods.
|
I think Honda pays vtec.net to hype things up. :)
|
Originally Posted by steve c,Sep 12 2005, 10:23 AM
Same folks who got 220+ on an 04. :rolleyes:
but i'd love to be proven wrong :) if those numbers are acurate, it could hit low to mid 14's! |
Originally Posted by steve c,Sep 12 2005, 02:23 PM
Same folks who got 220+ on an 04. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by steve c,Sep 12 2005, 10:23 AM
Same folks who got 220+ on an 04. :rolleyes:
|
Yes, Yes, Yes.... according to the National Board of Engine Dyno Associates INC. LL(BS)C:
All dyno testing must performed @ 74.2356 degrees and 43.25687% humidity and averaged with results from "Smitty's" In & Out Mustang Dyno off 85 South in Atlanta... or else results are void. GMFB. :argue: :thumbdn: |
If any of you guys actually bothered to read the article instead of jumping on the VTEC.net sucks proverbial bandwagon, you would see that they openly admit that the Dynopack reads higher than a dyno jet by about 10 hp. In addition, they also state that there is a very good chance that the car is a ringer and not indicative of what future HP rating might come in at.
As stated before, I' would tend to trust a company whose business focuses, researches and reviews everything from Honda that comes down the pipe. They hold more credibility in my opinion than a bunch of guys on an internet message board with an axe to grind. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands