533 Hp CR-Z.....
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Originally Posted by dombey,Nov 3 2010, 06:04 PM
...and it gets better than stock MPG? wtf?
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
I'm so frustrated...
I have owned a '87 CRX-Si
I still own my '90 CRX-Si
I love the body of the CR-Z
I despise the gutless crap under the hood of the CR-Z
I want a CR-Z in the worst way
I could not live with the gutless crap under the hood
Wake the hell up Honda
The CR-Z is real popular at SEMA this year, that says the body is loved, the drivetrain is hated. You are selling less than 1,500 units per month, imagine what you could do th the sales volume if you actually put an engine in the thing
I have owned a '87 CRX-Si
I still own my '90 CRX-Si
I love the body of the CR-Z
I despise the gutless crap under the hood of the CR-Z
I want a CR-Z in the worst way
I could not live with the gutless crap under the hood
Wake the hell up Honda
The CR-Z is real popular at SEMA this year, that says the body is loved, the drivetrain is hated. You are selling less than 1,500 units per month, imagine what you could do th the sales volume if you actually put an engine in the thing
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 23,911
Likes: 4
From: Benicia, CA
Originally Posted by Saki GT,Nov 4 2010, 05:06 AM
Better batteries, better breathing, better exhaust - its basically completely reengineered for efficiency, makes me wonder what the Honda engineers were doing...
Why aren't more cars using hybrid FI setups?
It would seem to me the instant-power of an electric engine, mated with a post boost gas engine could be a real Jekyl & Hyde eco/performance setup. I'd actually love to try that powerplant in a RWD config like the S
