Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

BEN SPIES...

Thread Tools
 
Old May 31, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #1  
2007 Zx-10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default BEN SPIES...

kicks ass

wow, what a dominating performance....even with a 200 cc advantage, Ducati is humbled
Reply
Old May 31, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #2  
Penforhire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Default

He was in a class of his own. Crazy fast. Next race should be interesting. He said he's never raced there.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 07:48 AM
  #3  
2007 Zx-10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

He's never raced at most of the European tracks, which is what makes his wins all the more amazing, while crusty old Haga has been at it for, what, 15+ years?

More than anything, I want to see Tardozzi and Ducati go down, I'm sick of them.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2009 | 01:00 PM
  #4  
2007 Zx-10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Bump

Almost a dead heat now in the points....go Ben!
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 03:32 AM
  #5  
vampire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
From: Kuwait
Default

Originally Posted by 2007 Zx-10,Jun 1 2009, 02:21 AM
kicks ass

wow, what a dominating performance....even with a 200 cc advantage, Ducati is humbled
the 200cc is not an advantage!
this should be equivalent for a 1000cc I4
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 07:06 AM
  #6  
2007 Zx-10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Yes, it is a displacement advantage! It's also a torque advantage. A 1200 cc 4 would obliterate any Ducati twin.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 10:10 AM
  #7  
Malloric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 2007 Zx-10,Jul 5 2009, 07:06 AM
Yes, it is a displacement advantage! It's also a torque advantage. A 1200 cc 4 would obliterate any Ducati twin.
Hence why it isn't an advantage. It would be like if NASCAR allowed DOHC engines of a smaller displacement. Or you could place an RPM restriction on the bikes at say 11-12,000.

It does help to be the dominate force in a series. You can throw your weight around and demand the rules be written or you'll walk away, and sometimes you'll get your way at least sort of. Ducati gave up a lot of concessions on the Vtwins to have the higher displacement limit though I can't see how they gave up near what they got.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 01:42 PM
  #8  
2007 Zx-10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Increased displacement is an advantage from an engineering/power potential perspective, although the rpm limit suffers with larger slugs. I've always found the "UPS truck" sound somewhat annoying.

Yamaha seems to be getting enough power out of their superbike (and of course the M1), but the stock '09 R1 is a dog.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 08:14 AM
  #9  
2007 Zx-10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Despite the horrible luck, I believe Ben will still take the WSB championship this year. Fabrizio might be gay?
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 08:54 AM
  #10  
Dan Hale's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,306
Likes: 0
From: On the back wheel. . .
Default

Originally Posted by 2007 Zx-10,Jul 7 2009, 10:42 PM
but the stock '09 R1 is a dog.
Have you ridden one yet?

Or do you just rely on other people's opinions?

Try one - you never know. . . .
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:34 PM.