Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

1969 Gt40

Old 01-10-2002, 05:55 PM
  #1  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Elistan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 15,324
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default 1969 Gt40

With the new GT40 being show by Ford, I thought it'd be interesting to put up a comparison picture of a '69 model.

Old 01-10-2002, 06:57 PM
  #2  
CG
Registered User

 
CG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: In the heart of the USSA!
Posts: 7,030
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

That's got to be one of the most beautiful cars ever!
Old 01-10-2002, 06:59 PM
  #3  
Registered User

 
ElTianti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rome, GA
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So everyone knows, that is GT40 Mark III. The Mark III was the road going version.
My fav is the Mark IV.
Old 01-10-2002, 08:17 PM
  #4  
Administrator


 
cthree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 20,274
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

yumm!
Old 01-10-2002, 08:28 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
eyescream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The Mustang GT in "Gone in 60 seconds" is a sweet car too
Old 01-10-2002, 09:24 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Cheetah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd be interested in a comparison also, but are there any hard stats out yet for the new one....better yet, is it actually drivable or just a show car buck?
Old 01-11-2002, 09:58 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
cjb80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont get that car at all, anyone else think it looks like a turd on wheels?

Maybe because it's a Ford product, but I dont understand why everyone is so excited about it..
Old 01-11-2002, 10:23 AM
  #8  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Elistan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 15,324
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally posted by cjb80
I dont get that car at all, anyone else think it looks like a turd on wheels?

Maybe because it's a Ford product, but I dont understand why everyone is so excited about it..
So far, no, you appear to be the only one. Sorry.

Why get excited? Well, for me, the car is gorgeous, it's wicked fast, and it has a true racing heritage as the top of Le Mans for a couple years. I don't care if it was built by Honda, Ford or Porsche - I admire it. If the new GT40 reflects that, rather than something emasculated like the Prowler, I will have something new to drool over.
Old 01-11-2002, 12:36 PM
  #9  

 
Zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: West Deptford NJ
Posts: 9,528
Received 133 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I think that's a MkIV, the one Ford is talking about is based on a MkII, I think.
Old 01-11-2002, 12:55 PM
  #10  
Registered User

 
ElTianti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rome, GA
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Zippy
I think that's a MkIV, the one Ford is talking about is based on a MkII, I think.
It's not a Mark IV, it's a Mark III. The Mark IV was a clean sheet design, not an evoloution of the I,II, or III.

The new GT40 styling is drawn from the Mark I. The Mark 1's were not very sucessful until Ford gave
the program over to Shelby and many aero mods were made, oh and they also put the 427 in it. The
Mark II 's have lots of ugly scoops on the sids and top, but they did win.

Get a copy of this months Car and Driver. it has pictures of all the GT40 models.

Quick Reply: 1969 Gt40



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 AM.