Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

2012 GTR

Old 05-18-2010, 05:54 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Glendale
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by [DT
,May 18 2010, 05:05 PM] This is from Inside Line:




So for all the weight-loss-chest-pounding, the difference vs. a "regular" GT-R is only 132 lbs.
Hell the 2011 Mustang GT500 does 110 lbs. for less than $1000 increase

Haha.

If it was a package on the standard for $10K-$20K maybe but at 2X the price of a standard GT-R it's ridiculous.
Old 05-18-2010, 06:14 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
parkerdw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by whiteflash,May 18 2010, 05:21 PM
I remember hearing that a brake job (at the dealer anyway) was $7500. Forget upgrades, that's some serious maintenance costs. But then again, I suppose if your buying a GT-R you're prepared for that kind of thing *shrug*

I'd love to own one.... if the car didn't drive itself
While it was once Nissan's official line to always replace rotors when your pads need replacing, they have since changed that to say it's ok to just replace pads as long as your rotor is still in good shape. The $7500 OEM/Dealer brake job issue has long since been solved by the aftermarket. There are numerous owners who track their GT-Rs and go through rotors/pads who have recommended many different pad/rotor combinations that cost just a fraction of that ridiculous Nissan number. While still not "cheap" it can be done for 2 - 3k or less for all 4 corners. The braking performance is also the same or better in most cases.

I plan on doing a down pipe/mid pipe and a cobb tune on my GT-R the minute my warranty is up next year.
Old 05-18-2010, 06:42 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Steponme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Fanman,May 18 2010, 05:54 PM
Hell the 2011 Mustang GT500 does 110 lbs. for less than $1000 increase

Haha.

If it was a package on the standard for $10K-$20K maybe but at 2X the price of a standard GT-R it's ridiculous.
Are you for real? If so, then you're completely ignorant of the topic at hand. You think the Spec V doubled in price for simply weighing ~130lbs less?

Short list of upgrades:

1) $50K upgrade in brakes.
2) More carbon fiber use.
3) Enhanced suspension system and upgrades
4) Many other aesthetic and functional upgrades
5) Collectibility jumps 10 folds.

Double the price for a 130-lb weightloss?
Old 05-18-2010, 06:50 PM
  #24  

 
whiteflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Benicia, CA
Posts: 23,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Here i was thinking the price difference was because that damn SpecV emblem was made of platinum
Old 05-18-2010, 06:53 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
Steponme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^ Platinum would not make the car's price doubled. If anything, it's made of iridium, uranium or something.

Edit: never mind! A search revealed that iridium actually costs less than platinum. Substitute that for rhodium. Or rather, make that Francium.
Old 05-18-2010, 07:07 PM
  #26  

 
whiteflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Benicia, CA
Posts: 23,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I forgot to add unicorn horns and dragon scales. Whoops
Old 05-18-2010, 07:18 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Steponme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^ Now you're just being ridiculous because those don't exist. I'm just gonna go with Francium. The Spec V is doubled in price because of the 130-lb loss and the use of Fracium in the emblems.
Old 05-18-2010, 08:11 PM
  #28  
Registered User

 
rockville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've been off the forum for a while and see that Steponme is still the current forum tool/troll. Sometimes change could be good.
Old 05-18-2010, 09:01 PM
  #29  

 
Chris S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 11,616
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Steponme,May 18 2010, 08:42 PM
Are you for real? If so, then you're completely ignorant of the topic at hand. You think the Spec V doubled in price for simply weighing ~130lbs less?

Short list of upgrades:

1) $50K upgrade in brakes.
2) More carbon fiber use.
3) Enhanced suspension system and upgrades
4) Many other aesthetic and functional upgrades
5) Collectibility jumps 10 folds.

Double the price for a 130-lb weightloss?
Sorry, but I wouldn't touch a car w/ $50K+ in brakes w/ a 10 ft. pole.
Old 05-18-2010, 09:04 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Steponme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by rockville,May 18 2010, 08:11 PM
I've been off the forum for a while and see that Steponme is still the current forum tool/troll. Sometimes change could be good.
I thought you put me on the ignore list? Missed me that much? I've been on this forum long enough to know you're a still an anti-Japanese, hatred-filled bigot from your back of the woods after all these years.

This is a Japanese auto (Honda) site and I'm a Japanese American who owns an S2000, both of which do not apply to you. If anything, I belong on here much more than you. It's just that sometimes, you anti-Japanese tools irk me. Yes, sometimes, change is good to kick those anti-Japanese bigots out. If you don't like it, hey, there're always the Mustang and Camaro forums.

/discussion.

Quick Reply: 2012 GTR



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:34 AM.