2016, er, 2017 Acura NSX aimed at Ferrari 458 for the price of Audi R8
#2401
The comparison is based on personal experience and this being an S2000 forum the last time I noticed
the question was about the NSX motor being over built
yes, I think it is and the relative example was that I didn't think the S2000 motor was over built in a similar manner
i love the look and elegance of the Aston but if I were in the GT zone,an LC500 would be my choice
the question was about the NSX motor being over built
yes, I think it is and the relative example was that I didn't think the S2000 motor was over built in a similar manner
i love the look and elegance of the Aston but if I were in the GT zone,an LC500 would be my choice
#2403
I like the current one better. And 8 speed slush box? I weep.
#2404
The following users liked this post:
WolfpackS2k (11-27-2017)
#2405
The engine was designed to allow them to up the power in the future to (cough) keep up with competition offerings.
i just crossed 5000 miles on mine in about 13 months
at full throttle and above 120 the motor is like la la la
in my s2000 at that pace the engine felt far more stressed
i just crossed 5000 miles on mine in about 13 months
at full throttle and above 120 the motor is like la la la
in my s2000 at that pace the engine felt far more stressed
In its current form, as mentioned by clutchcargo, the engine seems quite at ease. It "only" peaks at 15psi to make its 500hp, which is pretty darn low for any car, especially one at 143hp/L. For comparison, the 911 Turbo S makes 560hp from 3.8L with 17.5psi of boost. And that's 147hp/L. The BMW M4 is at 144hp/L at 19psi.
The following users liked this post:
mosesbotbol (11-29-2017)
#2406
Registered User
It would have been interesting if Honda released this car with a price range of $120k to $150k, then later released a $200k version with the wick turned up to 20 psi...
#2407
With the $30k incentive that they have on the car, the price range you referenced is currently the case
Based on the tepid sales prior to the incentive (which results in Honda losing money on these) I can't see them spending a lot on a version with more oomph let alone the full blown (so to speak) R version
They really need a Targa or Spyderto compete in the segment but there ain't no place to stow the panel or top
Based on the tepid sales prior to the incentive (which results in Honda losing money on these) I can't see them spending a lot on a version with more oomph let alone the full blown (so to speak) R version
They really need a Targa or Spyderto compete in the segment but there ain't no place to stow the panel or top
#2408
Would be nice even better if even less expensive to compete with LC500. The way the top Japanese coupes are priced, there is not direct competition between the brands. GTR, LC500, Supra (upcoming), and NSX are all at different price points.
#2409
Haha, which goes back to what I was saying, if Honda didn't change the whole layout and powertrain of the NSX development, may be it would have been around $100k instead for a 400hp J35 NA hybrid car.
#2410
Registered User
Based on the tepid sales prior to the incentive (which results in Honda losing money on these) I can't see them spending a lot on a version with more oomph let alone the full blown (so to speak) R version
They really need a Targa or Spyderto compete in the segment but there ain't no place to stow the panel or top