Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

C&D Z06 v Turbo v F430

Old 07-23-2006, 06:45 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
2QYK4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fanman,Jul 23 2006, 07:39 PM
What's interesting is the new Road & Track has the Ford GT vs. Dodge Viper, vs. Z06 vs. Ferrari F430 vs. Lambo Gallardo vs. 911 Turbo, and the F430 was substantially faster than the Z06 0-60, 1/4 mile & around the track. As a matter of fact out of the american cars they chose the Viper, even though it was slower, they said it handled better, and was much easier to drive than the other 2 amercian cars, and the F430 was the choice among the European cars.
Obviously you are talking about the GT500.
Old 07-23-2006, 06:46 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
2QYK4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fanman,Jul 23 2006, 07:43 PM
FYI, the 502 lb-ft. of tq is for a 10 second "overboost" period when you buy the sports chrono package. Regular figure is 457 lb.-ft.
Dang, only 457 lb.-ft? That has got to be tough to live with.
Old 07-23-2006, 07:11 PM
  #23  
Registered User

 
rockville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Funny, I know the test showed the Vette to be the fastest but I think I would fall into that group that says even the standard C6 is fast enough. Having driven a C5 Z51 I can say I love the car but I would have to go with looks and fun to drive etc. So honestly, I would take a 360 over any of the others if it were free. If I had to pay, C6 Z51
Old 07-23-2006, 07:31 PM
  #24  
Registered User

 
Diablo99V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 4,851
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Unhappy

Originally Posted by Fanman,Jul 23 2006, 10:43 PM
FYI, the 502 lb-ft. of tq is for a 10 second "overboost" period when you buy the sports chrono package. Regular figure is 457 lb.-ft.
Isn't this long enough to deliver the goods? As far as I see in the chart it was enough to run the same 1/4 mile as the Vette (if the chrono was used). Bottom line is GM did a great job with the Z06 but overall the Turbo is really the best sports car.
Old 07-23-2006, 10:01 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
C6400hp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Diablo99V,Jul 23 2006, 09:31 PM
Bottom line is GM did a great job with the Z06 but overall the Turbo is really the best sports car if you're more concerned about snob appeal than all out performance and if you can afford a car that cost $120,000.
Fixed it for ya
Old 07-24-2006, 12:00 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Glendale
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Jul 24 2006, 02:45 AM
Obviously you are talking about the GT500.
No, they got a Ford GT for the test.
Old 07-24-2006, 04:22 AM
  #27  
rai
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
rai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: mount airy
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Diablo99V,Jul 23 2006, 07:31 PM
but overall the Turbo is really the best sports car.
Ya mean 'best sporty GT car' (I think). It's obviously not the tip-top well at least not in a few months when the GT3 comes out. The GT3 will be a better sports car (IMO) and preliminary tests is quicker at the track than the Turbo.

Also you quote the 1/4 mile time of the turbo to say it's as quick as the Z06 true but you need to say "in a straigt line" while the Z06 eats 2 seconds a lap that's major (IMO).
Old 07-24-2006, 05:56 AM
  #28  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,699
Received 225 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

Some people are missing another big issue they raised about the Z06 - at the limit performance and driveability. Apparently it was far more difficult to take to the limits (and beyond), which hindered how fun it was to drive.

To me the results were predictable. Nothing is going to overcome a $100K price differential (Z06 vs F430) and nothing is going to overcome singleness of purpose (997 TT with a backseat and lots of weight vs two seater F430).

The only common link between these cars is power. Otherwise, the price, layout (2+2 vs 2 seater) and quality are too different to really be comparable.

For myself, being the "responsible" guy that I am, I would get the 911 TT. It's super fast, comfortable, reliable, handles well, and allows me to cram my little girl in the back if the need presents itself. An F430 would have to be in addition to a 997 TT.
Old 07-24-2006, 06:27 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
MDXLuvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N. Tx.
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I haven't gotten my C&D yet. However, I probably wouldn't take any of the 3. I would take a GT3 instead.

Atleast that's the way I am leaning this week. GT3>Z06. Last week it was the other way around.
Old 07-24-2006, 06:37 AM
  #30  
Registered User

 
Diablo99V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 4,851
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Exclamation

Originally Posted by candyass,Jul 24 2006, 02:01 AM
Yes the Turbo is a better car. If you want to feel like you have a large penis just get a corvette like I did, its better then Enzyte.

Fixed it for you too.

Bottom line is more people in the automotive world would take a Turbo hands down regardless of price. If they were by any chance the same price what do you think people would get? That alone gives an excuse for the price, its just better.

Quick Reply: C&D Z06 v Turbo v F430



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:56 AM.