Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Difference between Honda F1 and Honda Sportsca

Old 04-21-2010, 11:48 PM
  #1  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Vik2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Behind You
Posts: 13,211
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Thumbs down Difference between Honda F1 and Honda Sportsca

Thought I'd share. Came across this from another forum.

Originally Posted by Timpo
From Honda official website...http://www.honda.co.jp/F1/spcontents2006/f1catalogue/

Honda F1 engine generates over 720 horsepower out of 2.4L V8 NA engine.



Honda F1 engine pumps up more than 6 times horsepower/weight than Honda S2000.
Honda S2000 engine: 242hp, the 2.2L 4cyl engine weighs approx 200kg(440lbs)
Honda F1 engine: 720+hp, the 2.4L V8 engine weighs approx 95kg(209lbs)
do the math..



Honda F1 engine displaces 2.4L, however the engine inhales 3.2L of air



that translates to 500L of air/second at 19,000rpm



it takes 5.2 seconds for NSX to reach 100km/h
it takes 5.2 seconds for Honda F1 to reach 200km/h
(0-100km/h in 3.7 seconds, 100km/h to 200km/h in 1.5 seconds)



The F1 machine can generate 2000kg(4400lbs) of downforce at 300km/h
The machine weighs approx 600kg(1320lbs with driver)...therefore it can go upside down no problem



Letting go a gas pedal in F1 machine = Slamming on brake in NSX

When you leg go a gas padal, the Honda F1 machine creates approx 1.0 deceleration G (same as NSX's full braking capability), if you slam on F1 machine's brake, you will generate 4.5 deceleration G.



The cornering G of Honda F1 is 4.5times greater than NSX's approx 1.0G.



The powersteering for F1 machine is not so that you can steer...the F1 machine is really light, you don't need it



The purpose of F1 powersteering is to fight the G-force during the corner. Therefore the purpose is totally different than passenger vehicles like NSX and S2000.

Old 04-22-2010, 01:11 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
ziggy55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hawaii
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

kool info!
Old 04-22-2010, 04:55 AM
  #3  
Moderator

 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,954
Received 196 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

That's pretty cool, but one thing they all have in common is that Honda killed them all off. At least Brawn bought the F1 team...
Old 04-22-2010, 06:29 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Dr. WOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Easton
Posts: 5,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another thing they had in common is that while once best in class (Honda F1: from the mid-80s - early 90s / NSX: early - mid 90s / S2000: early - mid 2000s) Honda didn't improve the performance of any of them enough and ultimately because mid-pack runners.
Old 04-22-2010, 07:35 AM
  #5  
Registered User

 
buzz944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

thnx for this info
Old 04-23-2010, 04:15 PM
  #6  
Registered User

 
duboseq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 3,581
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

cool!!
Old 04-23-2010, 04:16 PM
  #7  
Registered User

 
duboseq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 3,581
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To bad engine life of F1 car is soooo short. Advantage s2000 lol....
Old 04-23-2010, 05:36 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Steponme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

An F1 car takes 3.7s to reach 62mph? I always thought it was 2.xx seconds, what with the low weight, high hp, and super slicks.
Old 04-23-2010, 06:14 PM
  #9  

 
budgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 863
Received 56 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

^^^ I also find that surprising....although its probably a typo.....I find 1.5 seconds from 100~200km/h to be completely unrealistic. its probably 2.7 seconds 0-100, and 2.5 100-200.
Old 04-23-2010, 06:29 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
sparrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^^^LOL at you 2. These cars make their power at 19k rpms w/ no traction control. They also did not use slicks between 1998 and 2008. How often does an f1 car get below 60 mph. Pretty sure the gearing is not optimized for magazine benchmarks.

Budgy, no just no... Have you ever watched an F1 race? The start is slow for a few secs and then everyone rockets down the starightaway.View any telemetry and you will see the same thing.

Quick Reply: Difference between Honda F1 and Honda Sportsca



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:12 AM.