Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Fusion tops Accord and Camry in Reliability Index

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-02-2008, 12:24 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Slithr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plano
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=al4t1gbundy,Dec 2 2008, 02:39 PM] Where are you reading this?
Old 12-02-2008, 12:35 PM
  #12  
Moderator

 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,955
Received 196 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nfty,Dec 2 2008, 02:59 PM
I call bullsh*t and would like to see JD Power & Associates results.

Honda & Toyota > FORD in terms of reliability.

Anything can be reliable when it's new. LOL!
You sound like an American buyer talking about Corollas in the 80s.
Old 12-02-2008, 12:46 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
nfty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^ Yeah, difference is I'm right
Old 12-02-2008, 12:49 PM
  #14  
Registered User

 
Vik2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Behind You
Posts: 13,211
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Predicted? What kind of bullshit is this?
Old 12-02-2008, 01:29 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Slithr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plano
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vik2000,Dec 2 2008, 03:49 PM
Predicted? What kind of bullshit is this?
Took some actual data and drew that line out into the future, I guess. Same as they've done for years.
Old 12-02-2008, 01:33 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Slamnasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guys, these JD Powers tests have been around for a long time, and all of a sudden when a Ford gets high marks over Honda and Toyota, well, there just might be something afoot? C'mon. Nobody was complaining about these tests when Honda and Toyota were winning them.

And besides, why is it so damn hard to believe? First of all, much of what contributes to these rating are the four cylinder versions of these cars, which sell far more than their V6 upgrades. And in the Fusion's case the engine is a Mazda unit. Actually, so was the old 3.0 they just switched away from for Ford's new 3.5 DOHC.

Man, mention an American company doing anything right around here and panties get bunched real fast.
Old 12-02-2008, 02:20 PM
  #17  

 
MuttGrunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SE Michigan, USA
Posts: 1,820
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cdelena,Dec 2 2008, 01:16 PM
Yup, I have had both on my S2000... more than once!

The last Ford I owned was far and away more reliable than my S2000 or my mothers Accord.

Too many are convinced that Jap makes are perfect and they are not.
i still call BS.

i'm not going to say the fusion is a bad car, from what i've read and heard its pretty friggin good for its segment.

people buy certain brands because of their reliability though. not all hondas hold up the same, and as being said, not all ford vehicles are the same either. all we can go off is trends.

there r surely s2000's that are lemons. everything breaks and nothing works - even if they weren't driven hard. this can be said about any car.
my father, mother, sister, and i all drive hondas (except my 94 prism aka corolla) because of the experience we've had with the brand. i give props to one of my home-town brands but....

keep your high performing ford fusion built in mexico, i'll take the trusty honda accord built here in america
Old 12-02-2008, 02:27 PM
  #18  

 
Anrosphynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MuttGrunt,Dec 2 2008, 03:20 PM
people buy certain brands because of their PERCEIVED reliability though.
fixed
Old 12-02-2008, 02:46 PM
  #19  
Registered User

 
X4DLuvOfSpeedX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nfty,Dec 2 2008, 01:59 PM
Anything can be reliable when it's new. LOL!
So you're saying that they compared 2008 Fusions against 1987 Corollas?
Old 12-02-2008, 03:10 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
GNN60GT500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Orange County
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My experience....

I own an 08 Ford Fusion with the Sport Package-

Now 12,000 miles on it......parked outside...still looks/ drives like new

My S2000 has 7000 miles on it and is garaged most of the time...

My S2000 needs to have the rubber around the windshield replaced...its an 07

My last car was an IS350- new motor at 40,000 miles due to spun bearing....

oil changed every 3000 miles- was told by Lexus tech that they have seen this with some IS350s- not thefirst time- sold car and replaced it with S2000 and Fusion

Car before that was an 05 Acura TL- bought back by Honda under lemon law with 6000 miles on it

car before that was 02 Mustang GT- sold with 84,000 miles- only problem was an alternator went out- covered under warranty

Were most American cars junk in the mid 90s...YES

But times have changed.

Im tired of seeing people say well I had a 95 Chevy Corsica with 340,000 miles and the waterpump went out..American Cars are Junk!!

Of course if you own a 95 Chevy Corsica, or a 93 Ford Tempo and that is your only experience with American cars, you are going to think they are junk...

Now I do think that GM still has a ways to go....but after checking out the new Mustang and Fusion at the LA Auto Show...I was EXTREMELY impressed with the new car- interior fit and finish- everything

Unfortunately for GM and Chrysler- their interiors still looked like cheap crap with more plastic then Bay Watch


Quick Reply: Fusion tops Accord and Camry in Reliability Index



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:58 AM.