get a evo VII our S2000
01-08-2002, 04:43 PM
#41
[QUOTE]Originally posted by pellisS2k
[B]
[B]
01-08-2002, 08:08 PM
#42
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gunma Prefecture,
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by GTRPower
[B]
Fact-
Mitsubishi ran the WRC for many years successfully using a Group N specification Lancer- Tommi Makkinen being the prime example.
[B]
Fact-
Mitsubishi ran the WRC for many years successfully using a Group N specification Lancer- Tommi Makkinen being the prime example.
01-08-2002, 08:30 PM
#43
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by nine grand
...my point does still stand. Over and over again. This is all I was saying from the start... So don't you dare come to me are start spouting off about these two items and whether or not their marketed against each other. Your wrong, dead wrong.
...my point does still stand. Over and over again. This is all I was saying from the start... So don't you dare come to me are start spouting off about these two items and whether or not their marketed against each other. Your wrong, dead wrong.
But not in this forum. And definitely not in this thread.
You can say whatever you want, and if you say it enough, you just might convince yourself, especially the point about a career in marketing being a prerequisite for real automotive knowledge. Gosh, I have no idea what the 4 P's have anything to do with the differences with a boxer engine vs. an I4 or the quantitative differences between 220HP vs. 250+HP, etc...
Are you threatening me in there? "...don't you dare..." or what will happen?
Choose your words more wisely. If I see another veiled threat again I just may report it to the moderators, who don't take too kindly to that sort of thing here.
If you want to get a real idea what the EVO VII is, take Jason Saini's advice and try a Mitsu Eclipse GSX. Similar engine, similar drivetrain layout, similar cheesy interior quality. Your "simple comparative statement" was false. Deal with it. Or don't, and continue in your suspension of disbelief.
01-09-2002, 07:22 AM
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gunma Prefecture,
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Inhale... Exhale... (smile on my face)
Sorry Mindcore. I've been done here for about four days now. But our buddy "GTRpower" here was so intent on displaying his knowledge to me that I had to let him lay it all out for me. I had an opinion and I got cut down for it. I didn't know this guy before this thread and I won't be dealing with him after, just having some fun with him.
Sorry Mindcore. I've been done here for about four days now. But our buddy "GTRpower" here was so intent on displaying his knowledge to me that I had to let him lay it all out for me. I had an opinion and I got cut down for it. I didn't know this guy before this thread and I won't be dealing with him after, just having some fun with him.
01-09-2002, 08:34 AM
#49
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its nice to see someone get so bent out of shape over this simple little thread. I'm happy to see that I have kept you running in circles over the last few days. I love getting know-it-alls like you into this type of round-and-round posting. It shows me how childish some people can act. Well, its been nice playing with you.
I have driven many Mitsubishi's and Suabaru's and from my standpoint, I like the Mitsu products more. As to the original dilema; S2000 or Lancer Evo, I say S2000. Not just because it's a Honda, but because you know what it is. There are too many questions still about the Evo that are unanswered. Look at how dissappointing the release of the Lancer in the US was. 'Nuff said?
Brian.