Honda’s Turbo 4-Cylinder
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Honda’s Turbo 4-Cylinder
http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2...otor-show.html
Enthusiasts have been calling for turbocharged Hondas for over a decade and finally the Japanese automaker has decided to listen. But there is a catch.
Officially revealed at the Paris Motor Show today , the company’s new HR-412E powerplant is a turbocharged 1.6-liter 4-cylinder motor that also features direct injection. It’s not a production engine, however, and is instead designed specifically for the new Civic World Touring Car Championship (WTCC) race car.
It is, however, a strong indication of the direction Honda intends to take with the upcoming Civic Type R, which only this week Honda CEO Takanobu Ito confirmed will go into production specifically for the European market (another catch).
In a release Honda says the future Civic Type R will make use of the “technologies developed through Honda’s participation in the World Touring Car Championships (WTCC).” Reading between the lines, it’s very likely that means a turbocharged direct-injection powerplant.
In addition, Honda says the new Type R will, “aim to set new standards in performance and handling,” with a goal of being the fastest front-drive car on the Nurburgring.
In summary, a turbocharged Honda engine might make it into the new Civic Type R, which isn’t planned for the US (though there’s still the possibility ), and Honda’s enthusiast fan base will have to be patient too, with the car not expected until 2015.
Enthusiasts have been calling for turbocharged Hondas for over a decade and finally the Japanese automaker has decided to listen. But there is a catch.
Officially revealed at the Paris Motor Show today , the company’s new HR-412E powerplant is a turbocharged 1.6-liter 4-cylinder motor that also features direct injection. It’s not a production engine, however, and is instead designed specifically for the new Civic World Touring Car Championship (WTCC) race car.
It is, however, a strong indication of the direction Honda intends to take with the upcoming Civic Type R, which only this week Honda CEO Takanobu Ito confirmed will go into production specifically for the European market (another catch).
In a release Honda says the future Civic Type R will make use of the “technologies developed through Honda’s participation in the World Touring Car Championships (WTCC).” Reading between the lines, it’s very likely that means a turbocharged direct-injection powerplant.
In addition, Honda says the new Type R will, “aim to set new standards in performance and handling,” with a goal of being the fastest front-drive car on the Nurburgring.
In summary, a turbocharged Honda engine might make it into the new Civic Type R, which isn’t planned for the US (though there’s still the possibility ), and Honda’s enthusiast fan base will have to be patient too, with the car not expected until 2015.
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like how everyone from the US "yawns" (from the CTR thread I posted) when they are not getting a particular car from a particular maker. Are you really that disinterested that Honda is:
a. trying to lift it's brand image in terms of sportiness
b. perhaps changing it's appliance-car making ethos
c. as such, will likely provide other sporty cars to the US market anyway?
a. trying to lift it's brand image in terms of sportiness
b. perhaps changing it's appliance-car making ethos
c. as such, will likely provide other sporty cars to the US market anyway?
#6
Registered User
I've recently driven two cars with different DI turbo-4 engines - the current Audi A4 and BMW 328i. Low-end torque exists in abundance, and response is instantaneous. Both cars have relatively low redlines unfortunately, and while the BMW maintains its thrust to redline (for a factory claim of 240 hp which seems to be an underrated 270ish since it dynos at over 230 on a dynojet) the Audi runs out of breath and tops out at a factory rating of 211. Both engines deliver some surprisingly good gas mileage - mid to high 30s on the highway. Honda would do well to adopt this sort of tech - efficient and sporty.
I think an S2000 replacement with a twin turbo direct-injection 2.4L V6 spinning to 8000 and producing 240 lb-ft and 320 hp while getting 30-35mpg would be awesome. Offer it in hatch (like Spoon hardtop) and cab form; 6spd manual and 7spd dual-clutch; sport, club race and touring trims. All RWD, LSD, 50/50 weight. No hybrid.
I'd go for a hatch 7spd CR. And I'd be willing to pay a fair bit for it. But I doubt it'll ever happen. Keep in mind the 2009 CR's MSRP was $37k. And that the Yen is super strong compared to the Dollar so it takes a LOT of Dollars right now to pay for anything made in a Yen based economy.
The strength of the Yen is, I suspect, a big reason the US isn't mentioned as a target for the CTR.
I think an S2000 replacement with a twin turbo direct-injection 2.4L V6 spinning to 8000 and producing 240 lb-ft and 320 hp while getting 30-35mpg would be awesome. Offer it in hatch (like Spoon hardtop) and cab form; 6spd manual and 7spd dual-clutch; sport, club race and touring trims. All RWD, LSD, 50/50 weight. No hybrid.
I'd go for a hatch 7spd CR. And I'd be willing to pay a fair bit for it. But I doubt it'll ever happen. Keep in mind the 2009 CR's MSRP was $37k. And that the Yen is super strong compared to the Dollar so it takes a LOT of Dollars right now to pay for anything made in a Yen based economy.
The strength of the Yen is, I suspect, a big reason the US isn't mentioned as a target for the CTR.
#7
TL;DR (lol)
Interesting, it wasn't their first try at it though. I believe the Turbo K-series engine in the 1st-gen Acura RDX was Honda's first attempt at a Turbo 4-cylinder. I own this car and the turbo engine makes it an interesting drive I'm relieved that Honda hasn't abandoned Turbo development completely-- it seemed like they did when they put a standard V-6 in the later generations of RDX.
Interesting, it wasn't their first try at it though. I believe the Turbo K-series engine in the 1st-gen Acura RDX was Honda's first attempt at a Turbo 4-cylinder. I own this car and the turbo engine makes it an interesting drive I'm relieved that Honda hasn't abandoned Turbo development completely-- it seemed like they did when they put a standard V-6 in the later generations of RDX.
Trending Topics
#8
TL;DR (lol)
Interesting, it wasn't their first try at it though. I believe the Turbo K-series engine in the 1st-gen Acura RDX was Honda's first attempt at a Turbo 4-cylinder. I own this car and the turbo engine makes it an interesting drive I'm relieved that Honda hasn't abandoned Turbo development completely-- it seemed like they did when they put a standard V-6 in the later generations of RDX.
Interesting, it wasn't their first try at it though. I believe the Turbo K-series engine in the 1st-gen Acura RDX was Honda's first attempt at a Turbo 4-cylinder. I own this car and the turbo engine makes it an interesting drive I'm relieved that Honda hasn't abandoned Turbo development completely-- it seemed like they did when they put a standard V-6 in the later generations of RDX.
#9
I like how everyone from the US "yawns" (from the CTR thread I posted) when they are not getting a particular car from a particular maker. Are you really that disinterested that Honda is:
a. trying to lift it's brand image in terms of sportiness
b. perhaps changing it's appliance-car making ethos
c. as such, will likely provide other sporty cars to the US market anyway?
a. trying to lift it's brand image in terms of sportiness
b. perhaps changing it's appliance-car making ethos
c. as such, will likely provide other sporty cars to the US market anyway?
So feel free to all you like. Until there is some sign of life from Honda North America, they will continue to bleed the customer base they spent 20 years creating. Then they can spend the next 20 years winning them back from Ford, Chevy, Nissan, BMW, Audi, Mercedes, VW, and soon Alfa. Any automaker knows those conquest sales are by far the easiest and cheapest to come by. And this time, Honda won't have the advantage of a domestic industry stuck in 1969. Ford and GM are no longer a joke.
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nofearofdanger' timestamp='1348969680' post='22047073
I like how everyone from the US "yawns" (from the CTR thread I posted) when they are not getting a particular car from a particular maker. Are you really that disinterested that Honda is:
a. trying to lift it's brand image in terms of sportiness
b. perhaps changing it's appliance-car making ethos
c. as such, will likely provide other sporty cars to the US market anyway?
a. trying to lift it's brand image in terms of sportiness
b. perhaps changing it's appliance-car making ethos
c. as such, will likely provide other sporty cars to the US market anyway?
So feel free to all you like. Until there is some sign of life from Honda North America, they will continue to bleed the customer base they spent 20 years creating. Then they can spend the next 20 years winning them back from Ford, Chevy, Nissan, BMW, Audi, Mercedes, VW, and soon Alfa. Any automaker knows those conquest sales are by far the easiest and cheapest to come by. And this time, Honda won't have the advantage of a domestic industry stuck in 1969. Ford and GM are no longer a joke.
http://www.nydailynews.com/autos/chi...icle-1.1170318
Just as a point of information... all Honda makes these days are "bloated Accords" and "an endless parade of obnoxious SUV variants" It's not like you US guys are receiving some kind of especially bad treatment. The fact that they are TRYING to do something with a new CTR, a new convertible and a new NSX should be good news for any Honda enthusiast regardless.