I drove a BRZ and hated it
#191
I'm currently DD'ing a 2015 FRS that I've modded with the usual bolt ons (catback, intake, ST coils, 57Xtreme wheels with 245 tires). I would say the braking and handling of the car is on par with the S2k but wholeheartedly agree that the powerplant is lacking in excitement. Both my AP1 and my STI make you want to go fast and reward you for revving it up to redline... the FRS seems indifferent and lethargic. Forced Induction would likely help to solve the problem, but that isn't in the cards for me as a temporary DD. I'll feel no regrets parting the car out and selling it when the time comes to move back home and resume DD'ing the STI.
#192
Stock braking hardware on the FRS/BRZ is far superior to the S2000. If you include the Subaru performance pack they're not even on the same planet.
Why did you switch to 245 section width tires? Your car would feel faster if you removed the unsprung (and rotational) weight you added via the wider tires and wheels. Gas mileage would improve as well.
Why did you switch to 245 section width tires? Your car would feel faster if you removed the unsprung (and rotational) weight you added via the wider tires and wheels. Gas mileage would improve as well.
#193
Stock braking hardware on the FRS/BRZ is far superior to the S2000. If you include the Subaru performance pack they're not even on the same planet.
Why did you switch to 245 section width tires? Your car would feel faster if you removed the unsprung (and rotational) weight you added via the wider tires and wheels. Gas mileage would improve as well.
Why did you switch to 245 section width tires? Your car would feel faster if you removed the unsprung (and rotational) weight you added via the wider tires and wheels. Gas mileage would improve as well.
The S2000 has appropriate brakes for the stock car, some would argue for more, and I agree they could be better. A twin piston front and back would have been nice. But necessary for its intended use? No.
Last edited by s2000Junky; 06-07-2017 at 04:41 PM.
#194
Stock braking hardware on the FRS/BRZ is far superior to the S2000. If you include the Subaru performance pack they're not even on the same planet.
Why did you switch to 245 section width tires? Your car would feel faster if you removed the unsprung (and rotational) weight you added via the wider tires and wheels. Gas mileage would improve as well.
Why did you switch to 245 section width tires? Your car would feel faster if you removed the unsprung (and rotational) weight you added via the wider tires and wheels. Gas mileage would improve as well.
Since the car will always feel slow to me, I thought I'd be better off working on the handling so that back-roads and on/off ramps are a little more fun. The car really feels great around corners now with the 245 setup and the 57xtremes look worlds better than the hideous stock wheels.
#195
Also Subaru of America can go f*ck themselves.
Took them TWO YEARS to just give the US the forgettable tS package that Japan got in 2015? FFS are they even trying these days?
#196
I saw that this morning. Yet another handling/appearance pkg with no added power, in a car where the former is already very good and the latter not so much. I didn't know whether to laugh or cry.
#197
^a little bit of both.
Apparently it's not even as extensive of a tS model as the JDM one. Lacking upgraded bushings, structural reinforcements to the chassis (beyond a few bars under the hood) and a special exhaust.
Apparently it's not even as extensive of a tS model as the JDM one. Lacking upgraded bushings, structural reinforcements to the chassis (beyond a few bars under the hood) and a special exhaust.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mike9000
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
112
10-14-2007 11:49 PM
watermain
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
23
02-11-2005 07:27 PM