MT: Hyundai Genesis beats Camaro, Stang & Challeng
04-14-2010, 07:52 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ny
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MT: Hyundai Genesis beats Camaro, Stang & Challeng
haha
1st: 2010 Genesis coupe 3.8
2nd: 2011 Mustang V6
3rd: 2010 Camaro RS
4th: 2010 Challenger SE
Motor Trend article
1st: 2010 Genesis coupe 3.8
2nd: 2011 Mustang V6
3rd: 2010 Camaro RS
4th: 2010 Challenger SE
Motor Trend article
04-14-2010, 08:42 AM
#2
Link doesn't work.
04-14-2010, 08:50 AM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by exb00st,Apr 14 2010, 08:44 AM
Brembos on the Genesis and the Mustang still outperformed it? Wonder how they would compare around a track.
I'd still take the Mustang if forced to choose between these cars.
I'd still take the Mustang if forced to choose between these cars.
04-14-2010, 08:51 AM
#6
04-14-2010, 09:57 AM
#7
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lets see.. the mustang beat the Hyundai pretty much everywhere, but Genesis wins? Sounds suspect to me..
Agree with above poster.. Mustang would be in my garage before the genesis every made it.
Agree with above poster.. Mustang would be in my garage before the genesis every made it.
Trending Topics
04-14-2010, 10:03 AM
#8
The Genesis handled better around their little figure-eight track. It was nearly as quick in a straight line, nearly as grippy, and apparently did drive lighter on its feet.
Not saying I wouldn't take the Mustang but the Genesis is arguably better looking as well, so it has a lot going for it.
Still, for $31K, you can get a Mustang GT with the 5.0L, can't you? Practically as light, equal handling, and way quicker....
Not saying I wouldn't take the Mustang but the Genesis is arguably better looking as well, so it has a lot going for it.
Still, for $31K, you can get a Mustang GT with the 5.0L, can't you? Practically as light, equal handling, and way quicker....
04-14-2010, 10:12 AM
#9
I'd take the the gen v6 over the stang v6 mostly because I don't believe in buying V6 mustangs not because they're not capable, but because you'll always feel inadequate next to a GT which really isn't priced that much more. With that said, i'd easily take the stang gt 5.0 and pay the difference over both cars, however the gen coupe v6 can be had for a decent amount cheaper, seems liek the mustangs when they're on the lots cost a lot more than the 31K starting point.
04-14-2010, 10:24 AM
#10
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JonBoy,Apr 14 2010, 10:03 AM
The Genesis handled better around their little figure-eight track. It was nearly as quick in a straight line, nearly as grippy, and apparently did drive lighter on its feet.
Not saying I wouldn't take the Mustang but the Genesis is arguably better looking as well, so it has a lot going for it.
Still, for $31K, you can get a Mustang GT with the 5.0L, can't you? Practically as light, equal handling, and way quicker....
Not saying I wouldn't take the Mustang but the Genesis is arguably better looking as well, so it has a lot going for it.
Still, for $31K, you can get a Mustang GT with the 5.0L, can't you? Practically as light, equal handling, and way quicker....
Other than that, Mustang was better in every category. Just look at the trap speed... that's not even close.. That is SERIOUSLY impressive from their base model engine..
and to me, the Genesis looks liked a cancerous G37... sorry, not biting.
