Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Official Audi RS5 photos... finally

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-24-2010, 08:14 AM
  #71  
Former Sponsor

 
Moddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 28,698
Received 38 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Looks very nice!
Old 02-24-2010, 08:14 AM
  #72  

 
rnye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris S,Feb 24 2010, 10:09 AM
It just blows my mind how many people can't get over the fact that GM has to make tradeoffs on performance vs. interior accommodations vs. other attributes to hit its pricepoint.
Its a fiberglass car with a pushrod V8. If the Z06 with its 6 piston brakes, aluminum frame and other light weight components (floors, engine cradle, etc.) were used in the base, amongst others, I could understand the cost trade off. While the C6 is a performance bargin, I don't see the tradeoff where high dollar, high cost parts were used thus sacrificing the interior bits - flat seats, hard plastics, large gaps, etc.
Old 02-24-2010, 09:57 AM
  #73  
Registered User
 
Dr. WOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Easton
Posts: 5,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The C6 interior was not a strategically planned compromise. Rather, it was the best interior they could do at the time. Show me a good GM interior prior to the last 4 years.
Old 02-24-2010, 10:02 AM
  #74  
Registered User
 
Dr. WOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Easton
Posts: 5,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fanman,Feb 24 2010, 01:10 AM
Yeah, some reviews I have read had raved about the V8 R8, calling it perfectly balanced, though SOME people said that if you had priced the car in the 911 Turbo range it should be able to match up with that car. The 420 hp car could not do that (though it did well against the regular Carrera S' & Carrera 4S). So some people have said that when you are in supercar territory prices it should deliver supercar level performance across the board which it now does. Though some other people have said the $20K price differential is too great.

It's all a matter of perspective. For example when the Autorides WebTV show compared the M3 vs. the GT-R vs. GT3 it was hopelessly outclassed. Though one wonders if those are it's true competitors.

With the RS5 slated to be approximately $20K more expensive than an M3 & coming to market 2 years later, you would hope that they would not set the bar at the M3, but substantially above it. I guess this is Audi's MO as the previous gen RS4 was priced substantially above M3 & AMG C car in the last generation as well.

HP wars are in full effect. Whether one considers the bar 400 hp, then another comparably priced car comes out with 500 hp, & now 550 hp, etc. At the price levels that they pay, they expect more. Something akin to The Cadillac CTSV coming out with 567 hp, so the FAST 500 hp M5 was not enough, and now they have a new upcoming M5 which will boast 550+ hp.
That's pretty much my point exactly. The 400hp example was not intended as the bar, it's the point of diminishing returns. Cars with 400hp are FAST, cars with more than that are faster but frankly what for? The so-called HP wars are a pissing contest.
Old 03-03-2010, 01:38 PM
  #75  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
exb00st's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Most boring video ever.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90h-ofJEq7o [/media]&feature=player_embedded#
Old 03-03-2010, 01:40 PM
  #76  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
exb00st's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Better:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRVfXYdBh-M [/media]
Old 03-20-2010, 01:06 PM
  #77  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
exb00st's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Starts at 68k?

http://m.edmunds.com/site?t=PCKbRircr9VPvg...BuQ&sid=edmunds
Old 03-20-2010, 01:09 PM
  #78  

 
stevoe88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Bay, Norcal
Posts: 2,724
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So what's the difference between this and the S5? they look almost identical ...
Old 03-20-2010, 06:15 PM
  #79  
Registered User

 
Vik2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Behind You
Posts: 13,211
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevoe88,Mar 20 2010, 01:09 PM
So what's the difference between this and the S5? they look almost identical ...
Under the hood?
Old 03-22-2010, 07:22 PM
  #80  
Registered User
 
stauren1203's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by budgy,Feb 20 2010, 11:01 AM
im ron burgundy?
Best. Movie. Ever. Also, very nice car.


Quick Reply: Official Audi RS5 photos... finally



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:43 PM.