Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Older RDX vs CX-3 vs HRV

Old 09-11-2015, 06:55 AM
  #1  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
iDomN8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 7,430
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Older RDX vs CX-3 vs HRV

Looking to purchase a CUV, currently have a 2007 Fit, thinking about something a bit bigger internal volume.

Price range in the low 20's (Canadian dollar)

Options: 2010-2011 RDX
Pro: Super AWD, fit and finish, comfort/luxury, Reliability (even for Turbo), hondata
Con: Premium gas, no warranty, gas mileage, used?

2) 2016 CX-3 Base Auto, FWD
Pro: Warranty, gas mileage, looks
Con: non-awd, no moonroof, depreciation, less luxury

3) 2016 Honda HRV, base FWD, 6-speed
Pro: Warranty, gas mileage, looks, reliable, tech, interal volume/flexibility
Con: non-awd, no moonroof, depreciation, less luxury, 6-speed for wife, she will need to learn

Looking for a smaller vehicle in that price point. Hauling 2 young kids and wife hates large vehicles.

Anyone have some thoughts, I have not driven any of these, just trying to narrow down my options to 3.

Thank you!
Old 09-11-2015, 08:14 AM
  #2  
Registered User

 
skinsfn36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My sister had an RDX, she just recently traded it for a CX3 Touring and couldn't be happier.

The RDX got absolutely terrible gas mileage, she drove mostly highway and would average 23mpg. From what I understand, the RDX was basically a full production mule for Honda to test turbo engines.

The CX3 is getting rave reviews. I love the new Mazdas. The interiors are fantastic and they're very sporty to drive.

I drove an HRV a couple months ago when they first dropped as a replacement for my fiance's 07 CRV. We both loved it and when it's time, it will be either than or the CX3.

I don't think you can go wrong with either the HRV or CX3. Drive both and shop prices.
Old 09-11-2015, 09:05 AM
  #3  
Registered User

 
s2k_9000rpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thoughts on a used CRV? should fit the price requirement and fix a few of the RDX cons
Old 09-11-2015, 09:06 AM
  #4  
Registered User

 
Marioshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,094
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Why do you "want" a CUV. I hate CUVs. They are like regular cars but ugly and with worse gas mileage. Why not get a sedan/hatchback instead?

Mazda3 hatchback over CX-anything.
Old 09-11-2015, 09:07 AM
  #5  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,699
Received 225 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

The RDX is way more car than the CX-3 and HR-V. Way nicer, inside and out, and it'll destroy them in terms of its AWD system, power, etc, etc. Big penalty for fuel economy, though - it's way worse for daily driving. Reliability shouldn't be an issue and you'll have already let someone else take the depreciation hit.

If you want a newer vehicle, I'd buy a used or new CX-3 over a new HR-V. Better looks, lower cost, better handling, quicker and they've been reliable thus far. Again, buy it used, even certified, and you'll get the better vehicle at a lower cost (or possibly afford the AWD version) with better warranty. They also come with low financing rates, which is a bonus if you're not paying cash.

http://401dixiemazda.com/used/CPO.html
Old 09-11-2015, 09:43 AM
  #6  
Registered User

 
Marioshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,094
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy
The RDX is way more car than the CX-3 and HR-V. Way nicer, inside and out, and it'll destroy them in terms of its AWD system, power, etc, etc. Big penalty for fuel economy, though - it's way worse for daily driving. Reliability shouldn't be an issue and you'll have already let someone else take the depreciation hit.

If you want a newer vehicle, I'd buy a used or new CX-3 over a new HR-V. Better looks, lower cost, better handling, quicker and they've been reliable thus far. Again, buy it used, even certified, and you'll get the better vehicle at a lower cost (or possibly afford the AWD version) with better warranty. They also come with low financing rates, which is a bonus if you're not paying cash.

http://401dixiemazda.com/used/CPO.html

I don't think the CX-3 has been out long enough to find a used one. It just debuted last month as a 2016 model.
Old 09-11-2015, 09:53 AM
  #7  
Registered User

 
skinsfn36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah the CX3 is brand new, along with the HRV.
Old 09-11-2015, 09:54 AM
  #8  
Registered User

 
Sebring AP1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: FV CA
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The CX-3 doesn't have a lot of internal space, which was a dealbreaker for me. The HR-V handily destroys it.
Old 09-11-2015, 10:04 AM
  #9  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
iDomN8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 7,430
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2k_9000rpm
thoughts on a used CRV? should fit the price requirement and fix a few of the RDX cons
CRV? Ugly, large and nearly the same space internally as a HRV (I believe the back end has more height but I just need more room for kids bikes/safety gear/shopping bags) plus I don't need leg room with two kids in the back I won't even bother removing kid seats.

Plus it's now priced outside the budget new... Used I could swing but again wifey doesn't like large vehicles and the CRV is getting there.
Old 09-11-2015, 10:08 AM
  #10  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
iDomN8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 7,430
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marioshi
Why do you "want" a CUV. I hate CUVs. They are like regular cars but ugly and with worse gas mileage. Why not get a sedan/hatchback instead?

Mazda3 hatchback over CX-anything.
CUV = Higher driver perspective and easier to maneuver... I assume more legroom too.

Wife hates the looks.. I kinda do too. I would go for a WRX if I was going down that path.

Quick Reply: Older RDX vs CX-3 vs HRV



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 PM.