Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Richard Hammond interview in CandD

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-24-2012, 07:36 AM
  #1  
Moderator

Thread Starter
 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,955
Received 196 Likes on 136 Posts
Default Richard Hammond interview in CandD

FRom the latest issue of Car and Driver, an interview with Richard Hammond. I especially like the part about how he prefers a Porche to a Ferrari because I think the same way.

http://www.caranddriver.com/features...ammond-feature

What I'd Do Differently: Richard Hammond

With Jeremy Clarkson and James May, Hammond, 42, hosts the BBC's Top Gear. We caught up with him recently while he was in the U.S. taping BBC America's Crash Course.


C/D: You’ve been in the States for six weeks. Are you homesick for England?

RH: No. One, I brought my wife and daughters over for the middle two weeks. And also, I’m really enjoying coming here. I travel a lot for work, obviously. But because of the shared language, as far as that sharing goes, America seems in some ways more foreign than many of the other places I go. And I’ve wondered why. I’m sure it’s because of that shared language that we can cut to the chase and get to the subtleties that make your life different. If I’m in Italy or Japan, I just want to work out how to say “beer” and “laundry” in the hotel. Whereas in the States, very quickly you’re actually sitting with guys and talking about what their lives are like. What they do. What matters to them. What their hopes, aspirations, and fears are.

C/D: Top Gear is being watched more and more here. Are you being recognized?

RH: Surprisingly, yes. We set out to make the best car show we could 10 years ago. That’s all we set out to do. That’s all we still do. There was no artifice, no cynicism about its creation. We didn’t sit down and think, “If we get three guys with these personalities . . . and then we do this . . .” We really didn’t. It’s luck, time, place, context, audience. Things lined up, and it’s found a global audience. We’re very lucky. You can have many careers before one of them involves a hit on that scale. I’ve done this job for 23 years, and I’m a very lucky boy.

C/D: It’s a hit on anyone’s scale.

RH: It boggles our minds. But it hasn’t changed it, really. After I come back from this, I’ll be in the office the following week and we’ll be sitting down having the usual meeting we have at the beginning of the season, saying, “Where are we going, and what are we doing?” We’re not thinking, “If  we do this, it will appeal to a big audience across South Africa or Australia or New Zealand or wherever.” We just do what we do.

C/D: Isn’t the problem with the American Top Gear that it is by its nature an artifice? It’s following your example.

RH: When we set out to do our show, nobody gave a crap. It was a pokey little car show on BBC Two. Nobody swiveled around to see us. In Australia, our Top Gear is huge. So the poor guys down there, when they got their own version, the whole nation swivels around and has a look. They were under massive pressure. We were afforded the opportunity to evolve—and I’m going to use a television buzzword—organically. They let us do that because the audience wasn’t there. From all the comments I’m getting from Americans watching the American Top Gear, it’s getting there. Given a little bit of time, they’ll find their own characters, their own way of doing things, and they won’t be emulating ours.


C/D: Is Top Gear still about cars?

RH: Central to the show—always has been and always will be—are the cars. It has to be. The moment you neglect the gearheads, two things happen: One, they turn away and never forgive you. And two, the credibility of the show, the believability of it, the thing upon which the whole thing pivots, is gone. There is no magic. Because, suddenly, we’d then be three guys saying, “Hey, we’re going to goof around and do silly stuff.”  You’ll never think of anything crazier to do than people can think of themselves. So it has to be rooted in something. It has to be in the pursuit of something.

C/D: How does Crash Course, which premieres this spring, relate to that Top Gear sense of authenticity?

RH: Oh, come on. It’s about big machines; machines that have a job to do. I love vehicles with a purpose. That’s why I prefer Porsches to Ferraris. I like things that have a job to do and do it, foremost. Which would you rather have? Do you want to talk about it in the bar, or do you want to drive it? I’ve just sold a Lamborghini that I loved, but thankfully I’ve kept my 911.

C/D: So will you keep your 997 Carrera S, or will you get the new 991?

RH: I haven’t driven it. And the drive is everything with that car. I simply don’t care about anything until I’ve driven it. If there’s that dynamic transfer of weight toward the back when you give it a boot full, and it goes fractionally light on the front wheels; if I can sit in the passenger’s seat blindfolded and be driven and know it’s a 911, then, yeah, I’ll probably change. If not, I’ve decided I’m going to wear mine out. I reckon that in one lifetime, you’ve only got time to take one 911 from new to the grave.

C/D: Is there anything you’d have done differently?

RH: It would be good to not work with a six-foot-five host who just hits me all the time for being short. But, no. Because if  you change one thing, you change a whole load of other Things.
Old 02-24-2012, 09:58 AM
  #2  
Registered User

 
omairtheman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Island of Long
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like Porsches to Ferrari's too.
Old 02-24-2012, 11:38 AM
  #3  
Registered User

 
rockville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for posting!
Old 02-24-2012, 12:41 PM
  #4  

 
Driven's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,045
Received 45 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

I love vehicles with a purpose.
That, right there, explains a lot of the cars he's stuck with in the challenges, especially the recent episode with him in the Noble.
Old 02-24-2012, 12:46 PM
  #5  

 
fernando.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great White North
Posts: 5,421
Received 158 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Good read, thanks for sharing.
Old 02-24-2012, 07:51 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
nofearofdanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good read. Wish it were a tad longer though...!
Old 02-24-2012, 08:43 PM
  #7  
Registered User

 
ninjajwl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 697
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Love the comment about Top Gear US. If I didn't give the second and third season a chance, I would be missing out.

Richard Hammond is my favorite TGUK host. This just solidifies that.
Old 02-24-2012, 11:26 PM
  #8  
Registered User

 
closetgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes I love that fact too. He's always favored Porsche.
Old 02-25-2012, 06:30 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
tarheel91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Driven
I love vehicles with a purpose.
That, right there, explains a lot of the cars he's stuck with in the challenges, especially the recent episode with him in the Noble.
I don't agree with 911's being vehicles designed with a purpose. It's got an engine behind the rear axle. What purpose does that help? It's more a car of tradition and heritage than anything else. Hell, it was adapted from a beetle. That hardly screams car with a purpose to me. It's a car that does what it does IN SPITE of it's basic design, not because of it. He can like 911s all he wants. They're cool, but they're not purpose built cars.
Old 02-25-2012, 06:33 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
nofearofdanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tarheel91
Originally Posted by Driven' timestamp='1330119668' post='21448390
I love vehicles with a purpose.
That, right there, explains a lot of the cars he's stuck with in the challenges, especially the recent episode with him in the Noble.
I don't agree with 911's being vehicles designed with a purpose. It's got an engine behind the rear axle. What purpose does that help? It's more a car of tradition and heritage than anything else. Hell, it was adapted from a beetle. That hardly screams car with a purpose to me. It's a car that does what it does IN SPITE of it's basic design, not because of it. He can like 911s all he wants. They're cool, but they're not purpose built cars.
Are you serious? Do you know the characteristics of an F1 car?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBrXft_p7Kg

Please educate yourself.


Quick Reply: Richard Hammond interview in CandD



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:42 PM.