S2K vs bmw M3 in looks?
10-28-2012, 09:57 PM
#71
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agree with this, & this is coming from a huge ///M fan.
10-28-2012, 10:33 PM
#72
SOOOOOO JEALOUS!!!! The only thing missing in that driveway is an air-cooled N/A porsche, like maybe a 964 or a 993 carerra s or RS if you're so lucky...
10-29-2012, 07:33 AM
#74
Funny you mentioned that
I am hoping to get a 993 turbo in the next 6 months
And possibly a LS swapped FD rx7
With those two on the drive way, I would complete my high school/college dream. I know many people care about
Torque/HP numbers and how much better they can get for the same price of another car. For me it's about fulfilling dreams and doing what I said and fulfilling what I set out to accomplish.
I am hoping to get a 993 turbo in the next 6 months
And possibly a LS swapped FD rx7
With those two on the drive way, I would complete my high school/college dream. I know many people care about
Torque/HP numbers and how much better they can get for the same price of another car. For me it's about fulfilling dreams and doing what I said and fulfilling what I set out to accomplish.
10-29-2012, 07:46 AM
#75
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The S2000 looks sooo much taller then the NSX. The thing about most BMW's is they sit low, with minimal wheel gap, unlike.the S2000.
10-31-2012, 10:36 PM
#77
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The E30 was trendsetting and truly a beautiful looking car. The M3 looks suffered on each update. If you like sleeper looks, the M3 is great. If you want to parade around in a "sports car", there are better looking choices. As a Sedan or 4 seat convertible, the M3 is a compelling choice.
a) Completely hideous
b) Far too heavy
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post