Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

STI is not greater than S2K

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-29-2006, 06:30 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
YankeeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Dr. WOT,Jul 28 2006, 07:22 AM] I'm really hoping the Evo X takes a big step foward from the econo-shitbox that the base car is today.
Old 07-29-2006, 08:48 PM
  #22  
Registered User

 
CBeyond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There are so many posts here saying "all you have to do is replace this or that component and the STI comes alive..." Everyone here who is supporting the STI has modded it. How much do those mods cost? Spending $3,000 or more to make the STI "fun" sounds like a rather unimpressive endorsement to me.

It sounds to me like the the S2000 in stock form is more fun than the STI in stock form. Is that true?
Old 07-29-2006, 09:16 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
jsalicru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 03_AP1,Jul 29 2006, 06:01 PM
while you're entitled to your opinion....

I love my STi - just flashed Cobb Stage 1 and I'm never looking back....
Wait until Stage 2
Old 07-29-2006, 09:21 PM
  #24  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
oshp515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Youngstown
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CBeyond,Jul 29 2006, 11:48 PM
There are so many posts here saying "all you have to do is replace this or that component and the STI comes alive..." Everyone here who is supporting the STI has modded it. How much do those mods cost? Spending $3,000 or more to make the STI "fun" sounds like a rather unimpressive endorsement to me.

It sounds to me like the the S2000 in stock form is more fun than the STI in stock form. Is that true?
they are both lots of fun....both great circuit cars...the S just is a little more pure....it should be, though, it is only a two seater and 500 lbs. lighter...i loved my S to death...and my Sti is great too, but I did things in that S that I never thought a car should be able to do
Old 07-29-2006, 09:21 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
jsalicru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CBeyond,Jul 29 2006, 08:48 PM
It sounds to me like the the S2000 in stock form is more fun than the STI in stock form. Is that true?
Well, I think the issue isn't so much about the fun factor stock vs. stock. The issue is that the improvements-per-dollar are SO HUGE on the STi (especially compared to the s2k) that its really fun to modify it.

IMO, With minor suspension mods (swaybars) to liven up the handling a little more, and basic stage 2 mods (turbo-back exhaust and ECU), the improvements are HUGE.. around 60 flywheel HP/ 80ft-lbs torque + much more lively handling.
Old 07-29-2006, 09:58 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
jlstyle82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

they are ugly
Old 07-30-2006, 01:06 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
jsalicru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jlstyle82,Jul 29 2006, 09:58 PM
they are ugly
Ehh, that was inciteful and objective
Old 07-30-2006, 02:34 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
y2ks2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jsalicru,Jul 30 2006, 01:06 PM
Ehh, that was inciteful and objective
I have always stayed on these forums because the owners were always great, never had anything bad to say about any car. But now its changed. Back then you couldnt get into an S2000 for anything like $35000. I think this place has filled up with kiddies who are getting them for $10000. To many haters now.
Old 07-30-2006, 05:27 PM
  #29  
Registered User

 
fusionchickenleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,367
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

i got the Evo over the STi mainly due to handling...it just feels more nimble. but unlike what everybody says, the Evo doesn't handle THAT MUCH better than the STi stock vs. stock...i just prefer the Evo's very precise steering feel more (one of the best steering in all the cars i've driven/owned IMO)

in terms of driving experience, when i first got my IX, i thought my brother's ap1 was much more fun to drive. but after 4 months and 7000 miles, i find the Evo to be insanely fun to drive as well...just in a different way.

at the end of the day, it's all personal preference. i'm just glad i have the luxury of having access to both of these cars...completely opposite of each other yet so ****ing fun to drive

to the OP: give the STi more time and see what happens. if u still miss the s2k too much, sell the STi and get an used s2k and a Fit (great car, my father owns one)
Old 07-31-2006, 09:53 AM
  #30  
Registered User

 
vtec9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by y2ks2k,Jul 28 2006, 05:21 PM
But its not. I pulled much faster AutoX times in my Sti over the S2000 sure the S2000 was fun. The S2000 cut the slalums like butter, the Sti gave you an arm workout.
2006 STI aside, the STI cannot hang with the S2K in A-Stock auto-x.. check the results from previous years. S2K is highly competitive.. STI is not.


Quick Reply: STI is not greater than S2K



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:17 PM.