Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

subaru developing BRZ turbo

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-24-2012, 01:28 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
SpudRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bullwings
Originally Posted by NuncoStr8' timestamp='1351092264' post='22105227
I don't think it needs a turbo as much as more displacement.
I'm actually in agreement here... it's not surprising, though. Also, the jdm spec EJ220 in the STis were 2.0 liter, as was the 4g63 in the evo.

All of that being said, I'm disappointed with all this movement toward turbos, bmw with the m3/5, all the AMGs, base models, mustang, etc. etc. I still don't buy the "turbos are reliable now" statement. Every turbo track car has cooling issues and is overall more expensive to maintain and run. The f10-m5 went into limp mode during a recent magazine test at the track after 2-3 laps. I'm not a fan.

I want more RPMs. Or, even displacement ala Porsche 968 - 3.0 liter four banger making 250hp - with today's tech/direct injection, that's an easy 300hp.

NA for the track and for reliability. All these demands for epa numbers and maintaining performance. What real world data will soon show the epa with all these turbo vehicles is that everyone is going to hate how anaemic their cars feel when not in spool (which is where the good mpgs are measured) and will constantly mash the pedal to get get into boost, thus killing mpgs.

TL;DR - inevitable, and good move. Would have rather seen more rpms and higher displacement while keeping it NA.
Driven any late model turbo cars lately? Lag is a thing of the past for the most part. And torque is enhanced over a high revving N/A engine anywhere near the same size. Face it, turbos are the most efficient technology currently available to get both power and gas mileage out of small engines with reasonable cost and durability.

Also, Toyobaru isn't trying to sell track machines. This is a sports car for the masses targeted at the low end of the market. 99% of these machines will never see a track. Do you think the manufacturer cares about racers?
Old 10-24-2012, 01:55 PM
  #22  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,699
Received 225 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpudRacer
Driven any late model turbo cars lately? Lag is a thing of the past for the most part. And torque is enhanced over a high revving N/A engine anywhere near the same size. Face it, turbos are the most efficient technology currently available to get both power and gas mileage out of small engines with reasonable cost and durability.

Also, Toyobaru isn't trying to sell track machines. This is a sports car for the masses targeted at the low end of the market. 99% of these machines will never see a track. Do you think the manufacturer cares about racers?
Sorry, gonna disagree with you on that.

Honda and Toyota are still using V6s instead of boosted I4s and they're killing the other vehicles in real-world gas mileage in their class. Can you get better numbers out of a turbo motor? Possibly, if you drive like a wuss and stay out of boost. Problem is, most people don't, which means that real-world driving favors the larger direct-injected V6s.

Durability still isn't proven. The main manufacturers that have run small boosted motors for "normal" passenger cars for years (VW/Audi and Subaru) have only proven that turbos tend to go bad eventually, cooling is always a potential issue and even tuning them can be problematic for all-weather/all-climate driving. Boosted motors have to be stronger, the tuning is more difficult and you have a lot more potential plumbing issues. They're hardly proven in reliability and that means they're hardly proven to be a reasonable cost.

I'll take a normally aspirated motor EVERY TIME on a family-type vehicle. With a sports car, I'm a little more forgiving of potential issues since the car is going to be run fairly hard but I only have to think about the Audi 1.8T motors or even some of the issues with the 2.0T to say "No thanks" to a modern turbo motor in a family-type passenger car that is supposed to last 150K+ miles (preferably 200K+).

Most sports cars are still going with normally aspirated motors. It's the plebeian vehicles that are going with dinky boosted motors.
Old 10-24-2012, 02:23 PM
  #23  

 
NA1NSXR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 204
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NuncoStr8
I don't think it needs a turbo as much as more displacement.
It doesn't need either, if the engine was up to par in the first place. K series and Renesis are like, decade old technologies in the same class delivering up to 25% more power.

Old 10-24-2012, 04:56 PM
  #24  

 
Disgustipated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,667
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Moddiction
Can't WRX's handle 350whp no problem? or are the suby engines fairly weak? I know evo's and previous 4g63 engines could easily handle WAAAY over that for quite a long time.
We can handle 500+ whp all day on stock internals, daily driven, track, etc.
Old 10-24-2012, 05:09 PM
  #25  

 
liquid_helix136's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,289
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I properly AM shocked by this statement. All I heard over and over was that Suby and Toyota were jointed, and whatever one company did to one car the other had to do to the other car. I also heard over and over that the new 'STi' version would be a 250bhp N/A 2.0 (which seemed over optimistic) so I figured when it finally did come out, it would be like 230bhp with suspension mods. Which is not something I'd want to trade the s2k on. If Subaru is gonna actually do a turbo model of the BRZ, then Toyota has to do one for the FRS as well, no?

It's not the fact that Subaru is gonna boost the BRZ that I'm shocked by, but Toyota actually making an exciting car is what's shocking to me.
Old 10-24-2012, 07:49 PM
  #26  
Registered User

 
S2k007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 3,081
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'd love a 280hp factory turbo, 27xx lb BRZ for 30k-ish. Its probably a tune and some minor mods away from 350 crank hp.
Old 10-24-2012, 10:34 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
NuncoStr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NA1NSXR
Originally Posted by NuncoStr8' timestamp='1351092264' post='22105227
I don't think it needs a turbo as much as more displacement.
It doesn't need either, if the engine was up to par in the first place. K series and Renesis are like, decade old technologies in the same class delivering up to 25% more power.
LOL. Neither the Renesis nor the K series delivers 25% more power (which would be 250 hp) stock without more displacement. The BRZ/FR-S motor is solid and delivers. It's just small for the task.
Old 10-25-2012, 02:03 AM
  #28  

 
TheDonEffect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,024
Received 483 Likes on 367 Posts
Default

Awesome, waiting for concrete news.
Old 10-25-2012, 04:02 AM
  #29  

 
dc2-2-ap1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,359
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

If this is true, then this is really good news. I will wait for official word (and specs) before I believe anything. I think it would be a good idea for Subaru to make a turbo version. I believe something major should differentiate the frs from the brz. I thought the whole bumper, interior and fender emblem was a feeble attempt. There was also the rumor of the frs coming out as a convertible- I think that is a good idea too. If both were to happen it could really open the market. Have the frs offered in convertible and coupe with the n/a 2.0L and the brz as a turbo coupe.
But honestly I don't see either option making it into production. I think they will ride the current one out for a couple years with the exception of that bs suspension sti version.
A little off topic but did you guys hear: kw just came out with a coilover setup for the brz/frs that has an edfc like accessory that can be adjusted via an iPhone app.
Old 10-25-2012, 04:55 AM
  #30  

 
GrandMasterKhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

iPhone app ajustablity? turbo? DAMMIT toyobaru


Quick Reply: subaru developing BRZ turbo



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11 PM.