Thank you Lotus!!!
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mountain View
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you Lotus!!!
A bit OT....but i'm pretty excited...
too bad it'll only have half of S's power
From Autoweek...
"Lotus Cars USA CEO Arnie Johnson says a federalized Lotus Elise will be in U.S. showrooms by fall 2003. The American Elise will have a 120-hp low-emissions engine and will sticker at $38,500 fully loaded.
That will include air conditioning, leather seats,
too bad it'll only have half of S's power
From Autoweek...
"Lotus Cars USA CEO Arnie Johnson says a federalized Lotus Elise will be in U.S. showrooms by fall 2003. The American Elise will have a 120-hp low-emissions engine and will sticker at $38,500 fully loaded.
That will include air conditioning, leather seats,
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Unfortunately TOR
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you'd probably be the only one on the road for miles with one.. rare I'll give it that much, but for the bhp and the weight.. I couldn't justify it.. but hey to each his own.. I prefer an Espirit Turbo, even if it's an older model..
just my $.02
-simon2000
just my $.02
-simon2000
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by simon2000
[B]you'd probably be the only one on the road for miles with one.. rare I'll give it that much, but for the bhp and the weight.. I couldn't justify it.. but hey to each his own.. I prefer an Espirit Turbo, even if it's an older model..
[B]you'd probably be the only one on the road for miles with one.. rare I'll give it that much, but for the bhp and the weight.. I couldn't justify it.. but hey to each his own.. I prefer an Espirit Turbo, even if it's an older model..
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Jose
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by kumar75150
120 is pathetic even with the light weight IMO
It should be at least 150, preferably closer to 175.
120 is pathetic even with the light weight IMO
It should be at least 150, preferably closer to 175.
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ahh..guys, these things are not to be sneezed at.
The power to weight ratio tends to make up for a lot, and on a track they will pull slightly better times than a stock s2k.
You can't compare it to the MR2, these things are all aluminium and fibreglass. Basically a road going race car, not some girly 2 door with a weird gearbox!
The power to weight ratio tends to make up for a lot, and on a track they will pull slightly better times than a stock s2k.
You can't compare it to the MR2, these things are all aluminium and fibreglass. Basically a road going race car, not some girly 2 door with a weird gearbox!