Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Why FWD?

Old 04-14-2005, 12:15 PM
  #11  
Registered User

 
AP2kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Harbor City
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thought FWD cars offered more inside room too.
Example, the civics with that flat bottom rear seats.
FWD cars can be fun though, Integra Type R, GSR, Civic Si, etc. they are all fun cars to drive. Also can be made to be very competitive on the track.
Old 04-14-2005, 12:50 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
blastr17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Valley Cottage, NY
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Slithr,Apr 14 2005, 09:43 AM] Bad weather driving and packaging are the two biggest reasons I can think of.
Old 04-14-2005, 12:57 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
temin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Metro Boston
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=JonBoy,Apr 14 2005, 07:11 PM]That's a pretty broad statement.
Old 04-14-2005, 01:41 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
s2kpdx01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Foster City, CA
Posts: 8,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

"Unsafe at Any Speed"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detai...=books&n=507846

You suck nader!!
Old 04-14-2005, 02:03 PM
  #15  
rai
Registered User

 
rai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: mount airy
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AbusiveWombat,Apr 14 2005, 10:08 AM
Big horsepower does not always mean bad fuel economy. The corvette with 400 hp gets ~28mpg highway and the 300c with 340hp and variable displacement gets 25 mpg highway. Both of those cars generate more horsepower and get better fuel economy than my turbocharged 2.0L. New technology is letting us have our cake and eat it too.
Yes and No

If you're generating 400hp you're burning more fuel than a 240hp engine.

It's cut and dry. But if you're turning 1500 rpm in 6th gear on the highway you're not producing 400hp. So you're getting good gas mileage.

Take a Z06 to the track, I suspect you'll get worse gas mileage than a S2000 both being driven at the limit.
Old 04-14-2005, 02:09 PM
  #16  
Registered User

 
ElTianti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rome, GA
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rai,Apr 14 2005, 02:03 PM
Yes and No

If you're generating 400hp you're burning more fuel than a 240hp engine.

It's cut and dry. But if you're turning 1500 rpm in 6th gear on the highway you're not producing 400hp. So you're getting good gas mileage.

Take a Z06 to the track, I suspect you'll get worse gas mileage than a S2000 both being driven at the limit.
I think I got about 11 mpg at my last track day, could a Z06 do a lot worse?
Old 04-14-2005, 02:39 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Caffeinated21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

S2K runs really rich in its powerband to protect the engine===>poor fuel economy
Old 04-14-2005, 03:46 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
benny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

And don't forget.......front wheel drive is harder on tires so more tires sold, harder on front brakes so more brake maintenance and parts sold, involves more moving parts in the half shafts and boots so more maintenance and service involved etc etc.
The auto manufacturers (I believe) also were very much aware of the increased profits for their parts and service departments when they made the switch to fwd.
Also fwd vehicles involved in accidents, especially involving the front half of the vehicle, are much more likely to be written off due to the increased cost of repair. So a few more cars sold too and....... a major reason why automobile insurance rates have skyrocketed.






Old 04-14-2005, 04:09 PM
  #19  
Registered User

 
Warren J. Dew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Posts: 1,135
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=JonBoy,Apr 14 2005, 11:11 AM]RWD is trickier in the snow, but to a good driver, it is (in my opinion) superior.
Old 04-14-2005, 04:43 PM
  #20  

 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,337
Received 400 Likes on 221 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rai,Apr 14 2005, 02:03 PM
Yes and No

If you're generating 400hp you're burning more fuel than a 240hp engine.

It's cut and dry. But if you're turning 1500 rpm in 6th gear on the highway you're not producing 400hp. So you're getting good gas mileage.

Take a Z06 to the track, I suspect you'll get worse gas mileage than a S2000 both being driven at the limit.
The Z06 will be a LOT faster too, so even if it's getting worse mileage, the Z06 driver will have time to run down to the gas station and fill out and get back to the track and STILL be ahead of the S2000 driver.

Having a high hp, long-geared V8 car is the best of both worlds. Good fuel economy at highway cruising speeds (even in excess of 100mph) and killer power when you want it.

Quick Reply: Why FWD?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:32 PM.