Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

4x4's

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-15-2010, 06:29 AM
  #91  
UK Moderator

 
lovegroova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Herts
Posts: 24,766
Received 300 Likes on 258 Posts
Default

I was just referring to posts 24 and 25.

Although I think we've established it's not just chippy impecunious types.
Old 01-15-2010, 07:02 AM
  #92  

 
Polemicist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ulaanbaatar
Posts: 6,331
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova,Jan 15 2010, 03:29 PM
Although I think we've established it's not just chippy impecunious types.
But 'they're' in the majority.
Old 01-15-2010, 07:03 AM
  #93  

 
GarethB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In Bed..... fordshire
Posts: 4,759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dreamer,Jan 15 2010, 03:39 PM
Re the door dings - you can't blame the car - but I was trying to understand why the width is such an issue (having proven that they are no longer than the baseline car chosen)
Not blaming the car at all, unless there's a 4x4 Herbie it is the owner's fault.

This has nothing to do with the car itself. A 4x4 on its own is environmentally friendly (it can't fill up with petrol and drive until an owner / driver is involved)

People.....ok some people.... don't like 4x4 owners then.
Particularly when they do not have sufficient driving skills to negotiate the smaller roads in cities, or the crowded, double parked streets outside schools. The "COMING THROUGH, LIKE IT OR NOT" attitude which is heightened (pardon the pun) by the sheer size of a 4x4

Perhaps it's inconsiderate drivers we're railing against here and it's just that inconsiderate / poorly skilled 4x4 drivers cause a lot more damage, panic and irritation that inconsiderate Polo drivers?
Old 01-15-2010, 07:50 AM
  #94  
Registered User
 
Mole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There were tests done recently that suggest high bonneted vehicles cause less damage to pedestrians at low speed than lower, basically in lower bonneted cars the pedestrian is hit lower down causing the lever point to be lower and slamming the chest and head into the bonnet at greater force. With higher bonnets they hit around the midrift to chest area and the lever point is higher making the head impact at a slower speed.
Old 01-15-2010, 08:15 AM
  #95  

 
GarethB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In Bed..... fordshire
Posts: 4,759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if it's between one ton at waist height and two and half tons at chest height I know which I'd prefer to be hit by!
Old 01-15-2010, 08:19 AM
  #96  

 
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hertford
Posts: 31,212
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

...which is why modern cars are all so fugly.

Really depends on the design of the SUV; you can submarine a pedestrian with something as big as a Landbruiser or a Patrol. Bars & winches tend to smart a bit, too. TBH though, it's a bit Darwin to not see one of those coming...

A Pious in silent mode is probably more dangerous!

You can make yer own jokes about a Panda paw X paw coming off worse than the pedestrian...
Old 01-15-2010, 09:01 AM
  #97  
Registered User
 
Mole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GarethB,Jan 15 2010, 05:15 PM
if it's between one ton at waist height and two and half tons at chest height I know which I'd prefer to be hit by!
But in these comparisons its not, its more like 1.8 vs 2.2 tons. Mine has nice composite wings, bonnet and bumpers so its softer on jaywalkers bodies.

The 4x4 driver would have probably spotted the careless pedestrian long before the car driver as hes much higher and has a clearer field of vision.
Old 01-15-2010, 09:15 AM
  #98  
UK Moderator

 
lovegroova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Herts
Posts: 24,766
Received 300 Likes on 258 Posts
Default

He may have spotted the pedestrian, but he's more likely to hit him, as the vast weight of his car means he can't stop as quickly, so will be going faster.

In fact, in a normal car, the pedestrian might even have been avoided due to the better braking and higher manoueverability.
Old 01-17-2010, 02:10 AM
  #99  
Registered User
 
dreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 11,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We could do our own experiment with stopping distances Simon at the next Surrey meet I have no doubt the LC will take a while longer, would be interesting to see quite how much further!
Old 01-17-2010, 03:56 PM
  #100  
Registered User
 
RISLAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: THE LAKE DISTRICT BABY!!
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well AJ 2 or 3 words for you, Pickup Truck, no daft tax, plenty of options and bloody good fun you know it makes sense
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrgarciainc
MidWest S2000 Club
5
12-15-2010 09:59 PM
ofire
Utah S2000 Owners
2
08-17-2010 07:19 PM
Moggy
Car Talk - Non S2000
30
08-08-2009 04:14 AM
Otherguy
Texas - Central Texas S2000 Owners
5
01-20-2007 11:03 AM
RM 4 2
Mid-Atlantic S2000 Owners
11
01-28-2004 06:17 AM



Quick Reply: 4x4's



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:55 AM.