Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Alfa Romeo Spyder 3.2 V6 JTS Q4

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 26, 2009 | 04:08 AM
  #1  
Bandit_287's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default Alfa Romeo Spyder 3.2 V6 JTS Q4

Anybody have any experience of the above car? I think they are great looking cars and maybe an S2000 replacement in a couple of years..

Apparently the V6 is a lovely lump.

Be interested to hear from anybody that has owned or driven one.

Paul.


P.s I still love my S and have no immediate plans to replace it though.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2009 | 04:15 AM
  #2  
Chris Type R's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 20,338
Likes: 0
From: North Herts
Default

I have a 3.0 V6 Alfa Lump, and it's not a bad engine at all. Bags more torque & torque steer than the S. I suspect that the S is a fair bit lighter than the Spyder.

The V6 is about 10-25 % thirstier in my experience.

The V6's are increasingly rare in recent Alfa's - predominantly oil burners.

I'm thinking about getting a 3.2 GT or 156 in the future.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2009 | 04:18 AM
  #3  
Bandit_287's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

Yeh it weighs about 1650kgs thats a lot of weight for a little convertible. Its not as quick as the S but just has the lovely italian styling.

Maybe the 2.2 JTS might be a better option 185bhp..

Do you mean the V6 burns oil?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2009 | 04:29 AM
  #4  
Chris Type R's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 20,338
Likes: 0
From: North Herts
Default

Originally Posted by Bandit_287,Jul 26 2009, 01:18 PM
Yeh it weighs about 1980kgs thats a lot of weight for a little convertible. Its not as quick as the S but just has the lovely italian styling.

Maybe the 2.2 JTS might be a better option 185bhp..

Do you mean the V6 burns oil?
Oil and fuel. 21-23 mpg. One litre of oil per 1000 miles is within tolerance ! My car does appear to be using less oil of late and to be fair it is 11 years old.

You'll notice the weight difference immediately.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2009 | 04:33 AM
  #5  
Bandit_287's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

May go and have a test drive of one,trouble is they are rarer than the S!

Thanks for the info though

Would like to hear from someone that has owned one?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2009 | 04:52 AM
  #6  
euan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 10,138
Likes: 0
From: Lothians
Default

s2kscot had one for a year or two, but I don't think he comes on here anymore. He recently chopped it in for a 2wd with the smaller engine, I think on the basis that it would be cheaper to run, bottom out less, and perhaps not much slower on the twisties in real life.

His old Alfa certainly did leave a fair bit of its undercarriage over roads across the Highlands if memory serves me right.

Lovely interior, great styling, and nice noise though.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 07:07 AM
  #7  
moff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,467
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham
Default

Best looking roadster on the road IMO.

Shame it's just too heavy, IIRC even with all that power it struggles to get to 60 in 7 seconds which is a serious disappointment.

The new 370Z roadster will be a much better option with more power and less weight.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 01:20 PM
  #8  
GarethB's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,759
Likes: 0
From: In Bed..... fordshire
Default

An Alfa V6 is a joy to behold.

Unfortunately the Brera is too heavy to deliver on the engine's promises.

The Prodrive fettled 2wd Brera S apparently improves (the weight of the 4wd system being at least part of the problem.) but it may be too little too late. A 3.2 GT is probably a better buy: cheaper and with a useable back seat.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 12:33 AM
  #9  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

most Alfas look pretty good

that roadster is no exception

I think it does what it says on the tin

(which isn't 'sports car')
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 02:56 AM
  #10  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Originally Posted by moff,Jul 27 2009, 03:07 PM
Best looking roadster on the road IMO.

Shame it's just too heavy, IIRC even with all that power it struggles to get to 60 in 7 seconds which is a serious disappointment.

The new 370Z roadster will be a much better option with more power and less weight.
Why is it Nissan seem to be picking up where others have given up?

That 'rev matching' feature is something I've longed to see on cars; since most people insist on driving 'stick' yet clearly are incapable, it's indespensible.

It also permits some wonderfully clever and smooth automatics.

The Infiniti version even comes with 4WS on the version with the sportiest pretentions.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:40 PM.