LSx V8 Swap [Primer/Info Thread]
5 Attachment(s)
I am nearing the end of my built 6.2 swap and want to compile my knowledge while it is fresh. I will avoid pimping brands since I am a big fan of almost everyone doing parts for this swap. I will just mention when a solution is available and when ingenuity is required(or both!)
Attachment 170565 What GM LS engines are a option? All LS based engines(except LS4) are possible.
T56, 4L60e, powerglide, and TR6060 seem to be the only completed swaps. I had a power glide mounted while I was waiting for my faceplated T56 to be completed. It fit well enough. A T101A is also a easy possibility so long as you solve shifter positioning. Cost? This is a hard thing to nail down. I will say if you don't include sweat equity you can accomplish some of these swaps for less than the gross cost(after selling your motor) of a quality complete turbo setup. It wont be cheap, but you can make it sway to the extremes in either direction. The iron/aluminum 5.3/6.0 swap can be affordable, 5.7 swaps are somewhere in the middle, 6.2 swaps are much more expensive. I'll elaborate. LS3 pull outs are at best $4500, L99s go for about $3500 plus another $400 in lifters, cams, springs, valley covers, timing setups, and misc to delete VVT and DoD. L92-l9xs are at best $2500 for a low mileage unit and require the same shit as a l99 plus a car intake setup. A LS1 cost around $1500. 6.0 and 5.3 pullouts are 400-$1000 with moderate miles. What fab work, and parts do I need besides the motor?
The engine is a pushrod lump of aluminum and is much lighter than a 2JZ swap. I suspect if you kept all the garbage in the engine bay you might add a three 30 packs of beer worth of weight. Removing all that fancy AC/Airpump/etc clutter gets some of that back then putting a big battery in the trunk removes the rest. This engine sits entirely behind the center of the shock towers so it is nothing like a miata where 1/3 of the motor is on the nose. Anyway I will update this in the next few days with more info. This swap is fairly popular but I feel like it has the potential to bloom as rod knocking AP1 units touch $4000. If you are a purist perhaps you are in the wrong section. I love my S2000, but it is mine and I will only love it more when this journey ends. There is something to say for the love a chassis independent of its motor and anyone who says the NA 9k revs are the only quality worth embracing on this fantastic car is overlooking the parts I love the most. Reference photos 06 Si outer and 2000 accord inner tie rods. Good fit for a great turning radius Attachment 170568 Space between frame rail and engine for header fitment Attachment 162277 |
Great information. I recently thought about swapping or building my f22c, and chose to build because I didn't didn't think swapping the motor to an :S would be easy.
If anything happens to this motor, I might consider going this route. |
Great info, finally convinced my dad that we need to do one of these as a side project among the others.
Can't wait for the butthurt to come in here. Oh wait, it's not Facebook, nevermind |
thanks for write up! looking forward to more!
|
1 Attachment(s)
I will update it soom! I am on fuel and wiring and then the swap is complete. Driveshaft shop just delivered my driveshaft so the need to finish this for good is very powerful
Attachment 170231 |
Sweet front bar/radiator support! Looks great!
|
Note for the TR6060. It is stronger than the T56 and is basically a T56 magnum with the 31 spline output shaft but the shifter tailhousing is different. It puts the shifter further back than the Fbody (and I think GTO) T56. Also, it doesn't use a slip yoke like the Fbody T56 and has a flange instead. Changing out the rear housing is possibly but I think expensive.
|
Originally Posted by Redline S2K
(Post 23987092)
Note for the TR6060. It is stronger than the T56 and is basically a T56 magnum with the 31 spline output shaft but the shifter tailhousing is different. It puts the shifter further back than the Fbody (and I think GTO) T56. Also, it doesn't use a slip yoke like the Fbody T56 and has a flange instead. Changing out the rear housing is possibly but I think expensive.
|
Originally Posted by Tehk
(Post 23970731)
But won't it be heavy????!?
<snip> This engine sits entirely behind the center of the shock towers so it is nothing like a miata where 1/3 of the motor is on the nose.</snip> The S2000 is a better chassis than the Miata for this swap because the engine *does* sit further back. The Miata has an advantage because the end result is so much lighter. My Miata weighs 2400#, which is about 450# lighter than a stock S2000. The LS is a *great* engine. When you get yours running, you won't be able to wipe the smile off your face. Very nice build. :) |
Originally Posted by grubinski
(Post 23987250)
Originally Posted by Tehk' timestamp='1463620739' post='23970731
But won't it be heavy????!?
<snip> This engine sits entirely behind the center of the shock towers so it is nothing like a miata where 1/3 of the motor is on the nose.</snip> The S2000 is a better chassis than the Miata for this swap because the engine *does* sit further back. The Miata has an advantage because the end result is so much lighter. My Miata weighs 2400#, which is about 450# lighter than a stock S2000. The LS is a *great* engine. When you get yours running, you won't be able to wipe the smile off your face. Very nice build. :) |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:26 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands