S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Gap for Denso IK24's?

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 19, 2001 | 02:51 PM
  #1  
pfb's Avatar
pfb
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 0
From: Boulder
Default Gap for Denso IK24's?

I've got a new set of Denso IK24's.

Do you just install them at the factory set gap like platinums?

Honda spec for stock plugs is 1.0-1.1 mm new, 1.3mm service limit.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2001 | 03:09 PM
  #2  
Takashi KazuMori's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,993
Likes: 0
From: Unknown
Default

It's pre-gapped I believe, just install them like normal spark plugs ... That's what I did, no problems whatsoever. You don't need to do any ECU resetting as well.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2001 | 04:04 PM
  #3  
cdelena's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

They claim to be pre-gapped but they are not suitable for the S2000. I tried them before I checked and felt there was a decrease in power. Pulled them and regapped them that really improved the way the car ran.

Try not to touch the center electrode when gapping to .04 in. Use anti-seize on the threads and be careful to torque right at 12-13 lb/ft.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2001 | 04:27 PM
  #4  
Big Al's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Spanish Fort
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by cdelena
[B]They claim to be pre-gapped but they are not suitable for the S2000. I tried them before I checked and felt there was a decrease in power. Pulled them and regapped them that really improved the way the car ran.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2001 | 07:09 PM
  #5  
rocketman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Rockville
Default

mine varied as much as 0.02 out of the box; two of them were the same (forget the numbers) and the other two were different. None of them were at 0.04
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2001 | 09:59 PM
  #6  
RT's Avatar
RT
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,269
Likes: 42
From: Redmond, WA
Default

I'm running mine at 0.050"
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2001 | 02:11 PM
  #7  
RT's Avatar
RT
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,269
Likes: 42
From: Redmond, WA
Default

Hey Harry, no real sound logic here, but I can make some up
If the larger the gap the better (to a point of inconsistent spark or other effects, timing variation...???..!!) then the upper bound of the service limit seems reasonable since the Iridium electrodes are supposed to last crazy long. If the service limit is 1.3mm (0.0512") then 0.050" seemed a good place to be.
I don't know
That's what I'm running mine at until someone scares me back to nominal
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2001 | 11:09 AM
  #8  
pfb's Avatar
pfb
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 0
From: Boulder
Default

Follow up:

- Stock plugs at 11K where in great shape.

- If you haven't done this already, remove the connector to the coil/plug connector instead of trying to remove it as one piece. Only really required for cyl. #4.

- Used Anti-sieze (small amount!) on the threads, very small dab of di-electric grease (silicon lube) on the boots.

- Gapped to .040, torqued to 150 inch-pounds (don't get many opportunities to whip out the snap-on 3/8" inch pound torque wrench!)
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2001 | 02:09 PM
  #9  
cdelena's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

After thinking about RT
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2001 | 02:44 AM
  #10  
HondaGuy's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Plano, Tx
Default

I thought the proper spark plug was the IK22, not the IK24? Or was that a typo?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 PM.