S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

My A/F ratio, how concerned should I be?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 02:31 PM
  #1  
Hitman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default My A/F ratio, how concerned should I be?

I am running a Comptech SC that is tuned with a VAFC (... I know) on an otherwise stock S. This is a weekend car that sees spirited runs and an occasional track day (I'd add/mix higher-octane fuel on track days).

This week I stumbled into a conversation about my a/f ratio with a respectable local tuner. When he looked at my a/f graph he immediately said, "That's too high! Don't push the car, you really need to lower the ratio."

This is my graph (the colors may be hard to discern; look at the line at starts at 13.8 AFR that declines, not the line that starts at 14.2):


What I have difficulty gauging is: How concerned I should be?

I don't have a good sense as to whether I need to take immediate action because I'm driving a ticking bomb, or to just note that it is running a bit lean and to retune or to upgrade the VAFC at my leisure. I'd appeciate your constructive comments and suggestions.

TIA.

Oh, and yes... he did advise me to ditch the VAFC.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 03:50 AM
  #2  
fltsfshr's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,868
Likes: 1,058
Default

I agree with your tuner completely. You're running dangerously lean.
fltsfshr
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 07:09 AM
  #3  
Hitman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Thanks fltsfshr.

I keep going back to this thread for reference: When is LEAN TOO LEAN? AFR

It seems that 13:1 is the target range for FI cars which makes me wonder why my VAFC tuner felt comfortable with my afr graph. At higher RPMs where lean fuel can be most damaging my afr is kinda sorta safe?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 01:12 AM
  #4  
spider's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, Cali49A
Default

You should have UL tune your car. 13.5 is a good aim for NA cars, but the number should be lower (richer) for SC cars.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 05:19 AM
  #5  
fltsfshr's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,868
Likes: 1,058
Default

yes you should be between 12.1 and 12.5 to run safe. You're actually running lean all the way across. Tough on your motor.

fltsfshr

Only way I could get that kind of fuel curve was to go to an aem ecu.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 08:27 AM
  #6  
Hitman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by spider
You should have UL tune your car.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 08:39 AM
  #7  
spider's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, Cali49A
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Hitman
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 02:33 PM
  #8  
bgbfflochp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC
Default

I would actually try not to go over even 12.2 for the A/F (WOT). I noticed in my car I'll get knock even at 12.3.

Honestly, when I'm WOT, my A/F parks at 11.0. I feel much more comfortable there. I would definitely baby your car around until you can get that changed.

Dave
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 02:35 PM
  #9  
kane.s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
From: The Beach, CA
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by bgbfflochp
I would actually try not to go over even 12.2 for the A/F (WOT).
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 06:49 PM
  #10  
gropos's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by kane.s2k
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:08 AM.