S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Tire Pressure and Hydroplaning Resistance

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #1  
CoralDoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 3
From: Davie, FL
Default Tire Pressure and Hydroplaning Resistance

I'm cross-posting this thread here and in the Wheels and Tires forum since I think the information should be seen by a wider audience:

Here's a link to a very informative web page on the effects of tire pressure on hydroplaning resistance. Since the OEM Bridgestone SO2 tire has a bad reputation for hydroplaning sensitivity, I thought this would be relevent information for our group.

In brief, even modestly lower tire pressures (25 psi in a tire designed to be used at 35 psi) can significantly reduce hydroplaning resistance. I suspect that as our tire wears, and it loses water-evacuation capabilities, maintenance of correct tire pressure becomes even more important.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #2  
chaseabryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Sunderland, MD
Default

Glad you brought this up, I was just worrying the other day about this. It was a torrential downpour and I was driving, nearly hydroplaning at 45-50 MPH. Thanks!

-Chase
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 02:28 PM
  #3  
mns2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,193
Likes: 0
From: Denton, Texas
Default

Great information. Thanks!
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 06:33 PM
  #4  
Scablander's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 155
Likes: 3
From: Cheney, WA
Default

If my memory serves me, I was taught in USAF pilot training that a tire hydroplanes at nine times the square root of the tire pressure when water depth exceeds tread depth. A tire inflated to 36 psi will, therefore, hydroplane at 54 mph when the water is deeper than the tread. At "owners manual" pressure of 32 psi, our S2000s should hydroplane at just under 51 mph when water depth exceeds tread depth. How does this compare with your experiences? Can anyone confirm that my info is correct?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 03:43 AM
  #5  
CoralDoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 3
From: Davie, FL
Default

Your information is correct ... in general. However, all is not equal - aviation and automobile tire designs are different since they have different performance parameters. For example, cornering grip while taxiing is certainly not an important consideration for the tires on aircraft, whereas abrasion and heat resistance are. Furthermore, the cross section of aviation tires is rounded compared to the more rectangular cross section of automobile tires. Plus, some automotive tread designs are more efficient at displacing water than others, and new breakthroughs in rubber compounds (like Bridgestone's UNI - T AQ) allow increased wet grip compared to other compounds.

I can report that relatively new OEM tires (near 7mm or 8/32" tread depth) do not hydroplane at 60 MPH, even when there is a thick film of standing water on the road (raindrops are clearly seen making individual splashes on the roadway), and well worn SO2s are planted and stable in a straight line at just over 50 MPH under similar conditions. These conditions are frequently encountered down here in the subtropics. I have heard from 2 other owners that their cars hydroplaned at 75 and 80 MPH respectively on tires of unknown tread depth. I once induced an out of control spin in my car at 55 MPH on an autocross course when I hit a deep puddle in the rain while cornering.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dr.darkness
Wheels and Tires
5
Nov 15, 2007 12:57 PM
CoralDoc
Wheels and Tires
4
Oct 18, 2006 08:39 PM
Fasttimes!!
Wheels and Tires
6
Apr 20, 2006 04:49 AM
J-me
Wheels and Tires
6
Aug 31, 2005 12:31 PM
sebrings2k
Wheels and Tires
1
Apr 29, 2005 11:05 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:19 AM.