S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

KW variant 3 clubsport

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #1  
stocky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,465
Likes: 0
From: the tracks around Europe
Default KW variant 3 clubsport

KW finished the final setup on my car and I have it back as daily driver now...

for the streetgoing track junkies it's the way to go
running 100N/mm springs front and back
turn in is now razor sharp...maybe a bit too sharp for daily driving.

also very sensible now to every little steering input.

too hard for bumpy roads right now (at least the setting I have right now)

not as easy to go on th elimit as with only H&R springs before.

Not more "just toss it ito the corner" right now...very precise driving is the way to do it now.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 01:39 PM
  #2  
bighead's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,401
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, Virginia
Default

90 kg/mm

probably 9kg/mm which is ~503 ftlbs... I thought they were 515 ftlbs?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 03:34 PM
  #3  
stocky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,465
Likes: 0
From: the tracks around Europe
Default

Originally Posted by bighead,Mar 10 2008, 09:39 PM
90 kg/mm

probably 9kg/mm which is ~503 ftlbs... I thought they were 515 ftlbs?
yep right
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 05:15 PM
  #4  
Boofster's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,726
Likes: 1
From: 茨城県
Default

Yeah I'm pretty sure stock were 10k which is 515lbs.

90k?? Are you sure?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 05:30 PM
  #5  
Antonov's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 3
From: San Diego
Default

aren't v3's 9k as well?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #6  
Hobbs5313's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by eurotrashdtm,Mar 10 2008, 08:30 PM
aren't v3's 9k as well?
Yes.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #7  
bighead's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,401
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, Virginia
Default

5k = 279 lb/in
6k = 335 lb/in
7k = 391 lb/in
8k = 447 lb/in
9k = 503 lb/in
10k = 559 lb/in
11k = 615 lb/in
12k = 671 lb/in
13k = 726 lb/in
14k = 782 lb/in
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #8  
Hobbs5313's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

^^ It's closer to 9k than 10k.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 06:44 PM
  #9  
bighead's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,401
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, Virginia
Default

to convert lb/in to kg/mm you multiply by 0.0179 and to convert kg/mm to lb/in you divide by 0.0179
http://www.onlineconversion.com/foru...1110951659.htm
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 06:48 PM
  #10  
Antonov's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 3
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by Hobbs5313,Mar 10 2008, 06:09 PM
Yes.
so whats the difference?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:42 PM.