UOA of LE 1605
I posted this over on BITOG if anyone is interested in having a look:
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbth...907#Post1495907
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbth...907#Post1495907
Originally Posted by INDYMAC,Jun 12 2009, 01:41 PM
I posted this over on BITOG if anyone is interested in having a look:
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbth...907#Post1495907
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbth...907#Post1495907
Originally Posted by energy88,Jun 12 2009, 03:02 PM
It looks like the contaminants have gone down progressively over time. The only exception is Boron which seems to have spiked up this last time.
BTW-Boron is an additive that the oil companies blend into their products to improve anti-wear and extreme pressure properties. Here is an article to explain further if you want to read it:
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbth...9116#Post729116
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by INTJ,Jun 12 2009, 03:18 PM
Seems pretty straightforward. Now if we can get the Mobil 75-90 crowd to do a UOA...
I use LE and wouldn't use anything else.
I use LE and wouldn't use anything else.
We already have a M1 UOA from X-Viper. It's included in the link that I provided above. But more would be better.
I always wondered why we don't see more UOA's of gear oil. Gear oils are the most suspect of all the lubrication products on the market IMO. The have very little to no oversight to meet API standards. And the API standards for GL5 are very loose at best. The weakest link in the drivetrain is the differential, yet we only see UOA's for the most bullett proof component of the drivetrain, the engine.
Originally Posted by 2007 Zx-10,Jun 12 2009, 10:26 PM
Try Amsoil MTG next time







