F20C to the Max
12-19-2007, 04:57 PM
#11
Former Moderator
Originally Posted by versionJDM,Dec 18 2007, 01:54 PM
we just need a whole NA forum of our own. period.
Have made the same recommendation to Cthree. I'd even volunteer to moderate. 
12-19-2007, 05:01 PM
#12
Registered User
This thread only reveals peak gains though...the powerband as a whole is more important than peak horsepower...torque would be a better judge of a products' power potential...list both...
stock 186/122
+ AEM EMS 1052U 208/138
+ Jenvey 50mm ITB's 215/150
As you can see, the ITB's peak only 7 more rwhp than the computer alone, so this would be an unfair representation of the power potential of this mod...the bump of 12 lb*ft of torque, an almost 10% gain...a very significant indicator of the advantages of ITBs.
stock 186/122
+ AEM EMS 1052U 208/138
+ Jenvey 50mm ITB's 215/150
As you can see, the ITB's peak only 7 more rwhp than the computer alone, so this would be an unfair representation of the power potential of this mod...the bump of 12 lb*ft of torque, an almost 10% gain...a very significant indicator of the advantages of ITBs.
12-19-2007, 05:40 PM
#13
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
once I have more time I will add a ton of dyno graphs to this thread, with the holiday coming up I just dont have time right now. I was just hoping this would be a good spin off for those of us who are just modding the F20 and not looking for larger displacement. Someday hopefully we can have an end all thread for intakes, exhaust etc etc and then all we'll have to do is update it for new products. 
Merry Christmas everyone!
12-21-2007, 07:52 AM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: boston
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wildcardtrd,Dec 19 2007, 06:01 PM
This thread only reveals peak gains though...the powerband as a whole is more important than peak horsepower...torque would be a better judge of a products' power potential...list both...
stock 186/122
+ AEM EMS 1052U 208/138
+ Jenvey 50mm ITB's 215/150
As you can see, the ITB's peak only 7 more rwhp than the computer alone, so this would be an unfair representation of the power potential of this mod...the bump of 12 lb*ft of torque, an almost 10% gain...a very significant indicator of the advantages of ITBs.
stock 186/122
+ AEM EMS 1052U 208/138
+ Jenvey 50mm ITB's 215/150
As you can see, the ITB's peak only 7 more rwhp than the computer alone, so this would be an unfair representation of the power potential of this mod...the bump of 12 lb*ft of torque, an almost 10% gain...a very significant indicator of the advantages of ITBs.
12-21-2007, 08:32 AM
#15
Registered User
Originally Posted by forum04pl,Dec 21 2007, 12:52 PM
wow that itb setup picked up some nice torque, even after you had run a aem tune on it. that thing must scream
12-24-2007, 05:35 AM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OEM Filter vs. Velocity Stack - No Filter vs. Velocity Stack w/ K&N Filter... Test done with OEM airbox...
OEM Filter graph was almost identical to Velocity Stack - No Filter graph.... Velocity Stack w/ K&N Filter was 3 whp less than the others...
Tests were done on a Dynapack...
OEM FTW!!!!!
OEM Filter graph was almost identical to Velocity Stack - No Filter graph.... Velocity Stack w/ K&N Filter was 3 whp less than the others...
Tests were done on a Dynapack...
OEM FTW!!!!!
12-24-2007, 12:49 PM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NA20,Dec 24 2007, 06:35 AM
OEM Filter vs. Velocity Stack - No Filter vs. Velocity Stack w/ K&N Filter... Test done with OEM airbox...
OEM Filter graph was almost identical to Velocity Stack - No Filter graph.... Velocity Stack w/ K&N Filter was 3 whp less than the others...
Tests were done on a Dynapack...
OEM FTW!!!!!
OEM Filter graph was almost identical to Velocity Stack - No Filter graph.... Velocity Stack w/ K&N Filter was 3 whp less than the others...
Tests were done on a Dynapack...
OEM FTW!!!!!
12-25-2007, 09:45 PM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Mateo, Ca
Posts: 1,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ShocK,Dec 12 2007, 10:52 PM
Unorthodox Race Pulleys with Fidanza Flywheel: 7whp
12-25-2007, 10:13 PM
#19
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by A51_AP1,Dec 26 2007, 01:45 AM
Where did you get UR race pulleys? From my understanding, UR only makes stock/polished oem pulleys. Just wondering where you got them from.
they are OEM size but made from CNC aluminum. I'm not sure if the OEM crank pulley is made from cast and rubber dampening or if its fluid filled. But the UR pulleys are just a solid aluminum peice, about 4 lbs lighter.
