JDM Tuning Expert advice and discussion on JDM tuning for your S2000.

FRP VS. CF

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 08:57 PM
  #1  
01S2Kevin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Default FRP VS. CF

Hey guys just wonderin' what the differences were between fiberglass and carbon fiber? Pros and Cons. Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #2  
Mr. Francesco's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,371
Likes: 1
From: never never land
Default

FRP is cheaper, CF is more expensive.

FRP is easier to fix, CF is stronger.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #3  
Billj747's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 25
From: SoFlo
Default

FRP - Fiber (glass) Reinforced Plastic.

CF - Carbon Fiber

The majority of CF products are fiberglass with 1-2 layers of carbon on it. Also their are many ways to manufacture CF parts from wet-layup (like fiberglass) to pre-preg vacuum bagging (much stronger and lighter) and vacuum bag + autoclave (lightest, strongest, and most expensive).

Most products are wet-layup which does not have the light weight or strength properties associated with CF (but it looks cool) because its cheaper.

Some (still relatively rare) expensive products are vacuum bagged and are very light and strong.

0.02
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #4  
cpoz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Without getting into a dissertation about all the composite materials (and Hybrid fabrics), it comes down to strength/weight ratio.

The quick list:

Fiberglas: inexpensive, easy to handle(molding/tooling and such), light, ok strength(compared to other composites).

CF: expensive(as all hell now. Have you looked at prices per yrd? ), more difficult to handle (vacuum infusion for best S/W % < prepreg), very light, high strength/ stiffness.

It all comes down to the right tool for the job. There are times I would much rather use FRP, Aramid(Kevlar) or S2 for a part.

~Chris
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 10:15 PM
  #5  
E36Ap1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 0
From: Rowland Heights
Default

FRP snaps easier it seem like. You can not really cover up damage to carbon fiber compare to FRP
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #6  
GPMike's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,513
Likes: 0
From: USSA
Default

The difference you need to know comes down to this....CF is BALLER!!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #7  
silver j's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
From: (O)range (C)rush
Default

the weight difference between the two types is normally negligible, i would say frp presents a better value overall while cfrp is strictly for looks. for example, the does the weight difference between a frp and cfrp mugen hardtop qualify for the price difference? exactly...but there is no question that the carbon hardtop looks quite unseasonable.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 11:09 PM
  #8  
Billj747's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 25
From: SoFlo
Default

Depends if it's prepregged-vacuum bagged and has the strength to weight properties of true carbon.

If it's wet layup like fiberglass, then NO.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 06:28 AM
  #9  
AP-DUECE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GPMike,Feb 9 2008, 05:51 PM
The difference you need to know comes down to this....CF is BALLER!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Loon
Car Talk - Non S2000
3
Mar 11, 2011 08:15 AM
SOHCmyDOHC
California - Central California & Sacramento
29
Jun 19, 2009 01:19 PM
jbell
S2000 Talk
37
Oct 13, 2006 10:01 PM
amongmany
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
4
Jun 30, 2006 05:03 AM
triumph87
Wheels and Tires
13
Feb 28, 2005 06:00 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:06 AM.