What digital camera do you guys take pictures with?
02-19-2016, 10:21 AM
#1131
6d here, also waiting to hear about the 5d mark iv
Lenses that I own
Canon 17-40mm f/4L
Canon 85mm f/1.8
Gold member of CPS also, so I often get loaner lenses when I want to try something else out.
Lenses that I own
Canon 17-40mm f/4L
Canon 85mm f/1.8
Gold member of CPS also, so I often get loaner lenses when I want to try something else out.
07-02-2016, 01:32 AM
#1132
Registered User
I use a sony A-77slt with the 16-50mm f2.8 "kit" lens (wouldn't really call it a kit lens because it is amazing).
s2000 mazda offset by jmr_s2k, on Flickr
audi rally drift by jmr_s2k, on Flickr
s2000 sunset by jmr_s2k, on Flickr
s2000 cityscape by jmr_s2k, on Flickr
Oh lord, pic whoring. I haven't gotten to shoot much with it due to the cold/inability to wash my car, but I am excited for spring to roll around. Also finally got a polarizing lens so pictures will look better once I do a shoot with that. I used to shoot with a Sony A-55, those pics are on my flickr as well.
s2000 mazda offset by jmr_s2k, on Flickr
audi rally drift by jmr_s2k, on Flickr
s2000 sunset by jmr_s2k, on Flickr
s2000 cityscape by jmr_s2k, on Flickr
Oh lord, pic whoring. I haven't gotten to shoot much with it due to the cold/inability to wash my car, but I am excited for spring to roll around. Also finally got a polarizing lens so pictures will look better once I do a shoot with that. I used to shoot with a Sony A-55, those pics are on my flickr as well.
Got an A77 as well. A6000 too. I love them both.
07-29-2016, 11:55 AM
#1134
Got the A6300 too (when it was released) and replaced my RX1 with it. Had the Zeiss E 24mm f1.8 at first. Loved it - super sharp and great micro contrast. But, I couldn't deal with no IS/OSS anymore when taking handheld video (pretty much unusable shaky AF video). So, I sold it and replaced it with the Sony 35mm OSS. Such an underrated lens, still sharp, but with the addition of OSS (which works very well). It was a great decision.
I was also contemplating and almost sold the A6300 to replace it with an A7II last month, because I miss FF. But, the video on the A6300 is just too darn good - no aliasing/moire at all, ultra detailed/sharp and has the lowest amount of noise, even beating the majority of FF video; except the A7S and A7SII of course, those are the low-light kings. But even then, the A6300 gets very close to the A7S/SII. Surprisingly, the video from the A6300 is 100x better than the 5DIII, Nikon FFs and regular A7II. Very glad I kept/stuck with the A6300 over getting an A7II.
I was also contemplating and almost sold the A6300 to replace it with an A7II last month, because I miss FF. But, the video on the A6300 is just too darn good - no aliasing/moire at all, ultra detailed/sharp and has the lowest amount of noise, even beating the majority of FF video; except the A7S and A7SII of course, those are the low-light kings. But even then, the A6300 gets very close to the A7S/SII. Surprisingly, the video from the A6300 is 100x better than the 5DIII, Nikon FFs and regular A7II. Very glad I kept/stuck with the A6300 over getting an A7II.
08-31-2016, 07:10 AM
#1135
Originally Posted by Ricky_Flowers_' timestamp='1411664655' post='23345108
[quote name='Mocky' timestamp='1411663164' post='23345061']
[quote name='Ricky_Flowers_' timestamp='1411652675' post='23344814']
[quote name='Mocky' timestamp='1411651708' post='23344784']
Testing out a new camera body and portrait lens at a shoot this weekend. Time to find out what the hype is all about with this Nikon "flagship" body.
[quote name='Ricky_Flowers_' timestamp='1411652675' post='23344814']
[quote name='Mocky' timestamp='1411651708' post='23344784']
Testing out a new camera body and portrait lens at a shoot this weekend. Time to find out what the hype is all about with this Nikon "flagship" body.
[/quote]
Ugh. If you bring that to the dragon, I want to check it out.
[/quote]
Consignment.. not mine
I can't justify a D4s. Client has a list of shots that require both high speed and low light applications. Figured this would be as good a time as ever to try the D4s. I won't shoot the 85 for those shots though. Lens is too slow. I'm a bit concerned with how the 85 will do on a D810. The DOF is so narrow that even the slightest movement is going to make the shot blurry, especially on a 30+mpxl body. I have a day to practice, and a day to shoot so I'll sort it out body and lens combinations tomorrow. Shoot is on Saturday.[/quote]
funny how that works.
I have a D4s and my D810 in the bag when I'm shooting. Ordering a 14-24 f2.8 before my next wedding shoot. Never thought I'd need it but there are certain shots where I just can't get everything I want out of the 24-70. Well, looks like I have the "holy trinity" now. 14-24, 24-70, 70-200.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post