payyourtoll

hey guys, I have ~1000 personal photos online with Yahoo Photos, and they are closing soon. I just want to see where you photo guys are moving to and WHY

I dont want to pay for an account if I dont have to.

options are:

Snapfish
Photobucket
Flickr
Shutterfly
Kodak Gallery

Thanks for any help

Rob

CarbonS2000

i use photobucket....its easy and they always work

Badger

Flickr but you'll need to shell out for a Pro account with that many pics.

Why?

The organisation vis sets and collections
Tags
Handy uploader tool
Bulk changes
Groups you can add your photos too to share an interest
Critiques
Generally friendly members

Oodles of reasons really

e3opian

It's been said around here that Photobucket recompresses your images.

Go with Flickr and pay the $20. It's already been worth it to me for the contacts I've made.

Aaron

Heyitsgary

I got the same email from them. I thought, again, thought, the note read that if you cofirm before a certain date, they would do the transfer to Flickr for you you. I could be completely off the wall here, but it's what I remember.

I use Google for pics, I found the integration into the desktop Picasa client very useful and limited the number of individual steps I needed to do to manage/publish my stuff.

MicahWeber

make ur own website ? and always have ur own server to work it.... i host a pic with a drop and drag, its so nice and easy

Kevbo1983

Definitely flickr.....and pay the $20 a year, it's worth it!

motoozzie

[QUOTE=Heyitsgary,Jul 18 2007, 01:31 PM]I got the same email from them.

F1-Fanatic

I like your website software... Very nice

Doug0716

Hit up gallery.s2000.org if you want...

Sign up for an account and let me know how much storage use you need and I can make it happen.
-Doug