S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

E85 vs 98 octane gas for turbo setup

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-15-2008, 03:47 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
s2kswe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default E85 vs 98 octane gas for turbo setup

Hi

A question popped up in my head about e85 and turbocharging.
I have been planning a turbobuild for some moths now and read alot about it. I did not find any useful info about E85 as fuel tho. I have heard E85 is more like "racegas" due to the higher octane number.

Assume I get a GT3076r or a GT3071r and install it together with all extras required. A good ems larger injectors stronger fuelpump etc.
I was thinking going 7psi (about 0,5bar) with the regular pump gas. (Here in Sweden you can buy 95 or 98 octane) This is on stock internals.

Would really like some facts about these things as there are plenty of e85 pumps in my area, and that fuel is an option if it is better for the car.
Anything else about the honda that dont like E85?

Regards from Sweden

By the way, this is taken from wiki.
E85 is an alcohol fuel mixture that typically contains a mixture of up to 85% denatured fuel ethanol and gasoline or other hydrocarbon by volume.
Depending on composition and source, E85 has an octane rating of 100 - 105
Old 03-15-2008, 05:42 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
PeanutButter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dont quote me on this, but this is what I heard.

You need really big injectors and a lot of fuel pressure.
Old 03-15-2008, 07:33 AM
  #3  

 
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 10,298
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeanutButter,Mar 15 2008, 08:42 AM
Dont quote me on this, but this is what I heard.

You need really big injectors and a lot of fuel pressure.
correct


Not to mention its timing that E85 helps out with a lot due to it being basically race fuel not so much boost (although they are slightly proportional).
Old 03-15-2008, 08:06 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
s2kswe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Mar 15 2008, 07:33 AM
correct


Not to mention its timing that E85 helps out with a lot due to it being basically race fuel not so much boost (although they are slightly proportional).
So what exactly are you meaning here, sorry but i do not understand.
You are saying something about that e85 helps out with the timing in some way.
Old 03-15-2008, 08:42 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
deathsled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

to run e85 you pretty much need a fuel system capable of double what you would need if you were running gasoline.
Old 03-15-2008, 04:11 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
corners2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If someone could engineer an FSI solution with E85 you could make some good numbers.
Old 03-15-2008, 04:44 PM
  #7  

 
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 10,298
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2kswe,Mar 15 2008, 11:06 AM
So what exactly are you meaning here, sorry but i do not understand.
You are saying something about that e85 helps out with the timing in some way.
I'm saying the real benefit of E85 is not running more boost but running much more timing at the same boost level as compared to regular fuel. The problem is that you need an upgraded fuel system beyond just a simple walboro fuel pump.
Old 03-15-2008, 07:52 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
logicaldude777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think Spec_Ops2087 is saying that the higher octane of the E85 provides a higher flashpoint. That means the timing can be advanced to a greater degree without detonation. E85 also has a higher heat latency (sp.). Better heat dispersal and the opportunity to add more boost than with regular pump gas.
Water and methanol injection have been used for years in turbine powered aircraft to decrease the effects of high ambient temp and high density altitude to provide a higher level of performance for a short period of time( ie. takeoff and climbout).
I drive a flex fuel vehicle as my daily driver and have noticed two obvious difference over regular pump gas.
1. decreased mileage
2. no valve knock (which is not considered to be a prolbem with my rig).

Old 03-15-2008, 10:23 PM
  #9  

 
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 10,298
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

That pretty much sums it up


Basically, I feel that a water / meth injection would be easier and cheaper in the long run (not to mention nearly as efficient).
Old 03-16-2008, 04:33 AM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
s2kswe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Informative answers. Thanks.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gen0ss
S2000 Engine Management
11
08-11-2016 11:23 AM
hughs2k
S2000 Talk
48
04-29-2008 07:11 PM
stantaur
S2000 Forced Induction
12
05-25-2007 07:05 AM
Kens_s2000
S2000 Talk
5
10-01-2004 12:05 PM
SJSHARKS
S2000 Talk
10
07-11-2003 04:45 PM



Quick Reply: E85 vs 98 octane gas for turbo setup



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:17 AM.